SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SANTOSH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
['Vijay Kumar', '', 'MOHIT SHRIWASTAVA', 'Narsingh Tanti']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62256 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2014 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul

======================================================

1.

SANTOSH YADAV Son of Bhupendra Yadav Resident of Village- Gaurav

Garh Ward No. 6, P.S.- Supaul, District- Supaul

2.

Ram Vilash Yadav @ Ram Balash yadav Son of Jhamali Yadav @ Jhameli

Yadav Resident of Village- Gaurav Garh Ward No. 6, P.S.- Supaul, District-

Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Vijay Kumar

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narsingh Tanti

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA

ORAL ORDER

3

19-12-2019

This matter has come up under the heading “To be

mentioned” at the instance of the learned counsel for the

petitioners who submits that by order dated 06.12.2019 the

above petitioners were granted bail, however the cause title of

the order-sheet has wrongly been typed as under :

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72256 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-391

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top