SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Justice Vikash Jain
MUKESH MAHALDAR @ MUKESH BAHARDAR – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60415 of 2019

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2019 Thana- ARARIA District- Araria

======================================================

MUKESH MAHALDAR @ MUKESH BAHARDAR Son of Kare Bahardar

Resident of Village- Lahna Rampur, P.S. and District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr.Baleshwar Kamat

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN

ORAL ORDER

2

26-09-2019

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences

alleged under Section 376/4 of the Indian Penal Code and

Section 4 of the POCSO Act, registered in connection with

Special (POCSO) Case No. 29 of 2019 arising out of Araria

(Mahila) P.S. Case No. 53 of 2019.

3. At the very outset, learned APP submits that the

petition for anticipatory bail is not maintainable under Section

438(3) Cr. P.C. as there is direct allegation aga

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top