HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Sudarshan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CWJC 19624/2019
['Kumari Rashmi', '', 'Suresh Pd Singh No', 'ANIRBAN KUNDU SC']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19624 of 2019
======================================================
1.
Sudarshan Kumar S/o Sri Munshi Mahato, Resident of Village-
Makhdumpur, Po and PS- Sonepur, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
2.
Ram Chandra Singh S/o Parma Singh R/o Mushehari, PS.Dariyapur, Distt.-
Chapra (Saran).
3.
Smt. Pratima Devi W/o Sri Santosh Kumar, R/o Village-G.S. Bangara, PS.-
Jalalpur, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
4.
Smt. Bandana Kumari W/o Sri Ranjeet KUmar Singh Village-and PO-
Gopalpur, PS-Nayagaon, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
5.
Ram Ayodhya Prasad S/o Late Kalpat Mahto, R/o Village-Pachrour, PS.
Taraiya, Distt.-Saran.
6.
Smt. Chanda Devi W/o Rajeev Kumar Singh R/o Village-Purushotampur
Harajee, PS.-Awatar Nagar, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
7.
Vijay Kumar Yadav S/o Srilaldas Rai, R/o Village-Hasilpur, PO and PS-
Nayagaon, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
8.
Bipin KUmar Singh S/o Jitnarayan Singh Resident of Village-Laxmipur
Kakaria, P.S. Dighwara Distt. Saran.
9.
Manish Kumar S/o Madan Mohan Prasad Resident of Village-Fakrabad, PS
Sonepur, Distt.-Chapra (Saran).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Minor Irrigarion,
Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Chief Engineer, (Planning Superintendence and Underground Water),
Minor Irrigation Department, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Superintending Engineer (Head Quarter), Superintendence, Secretary,
Road, Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Minor, Irrigation
Department, Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division, Chapra.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr. Anirban Kundu (SC 24)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
2
12-12-2022
Petitioners has prayed for the following relief(s):-
Patna High Court CWJC No.19624 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2022
2/5
“i. For quashing the letter no. 1127 /Chapra
dated 19.06.2019 issued by Respondent No.4 in
connection with NIT No. 02/2018-2019
dt.5.2.2019 for renovation of old tube wells,
under the reason that initially respondents have
invited NIT and executed agreements after more
than two months though the period of
completion was for only 94 days, taking shelter
of imposition of Moral Code of Conduct on the
eve of parliamentary elections, and later on,
unilatorily changed the provision for payment of
bills of work by the Mukhiyas, without any
supplementary agreement, and on raising voice
against such illegal acts, has rescinded
altogether 12 contracts shifting reason of delay
on petitioners by a general order without any
specific show cause notice and forfeited the
Security amount and EMDs unilaterally, leaving
aside some of their choice contractors, which is
patently illegal and not sustainable in law as
firstly he delayed in execution of agreements,
not deployed any JE or AE, not provided
specific clear site, not supplied attested copy of
agreements, and changed the rule unilatorily
without any supplementary agreement with
Mukhiyas, hence for the fault of his own, he
cannot punish the petitioners, as it is settle law
that once the game started, no rule of game can
be changed, hence the impugned order cannot
sustain on any count apart from other merits of
the case and may be quashed, holding entire
action taken by respondent no.4 as illegal and
Patna High Court CWJC No.19624 of 2019(2) dt.12-12-2022
3/5
arbitrary.
ii. For quashing the impugned order also under
the reason that neither in the NIT nor
agreements, payment of bills were mentioned by
Mukhiyas, and when the agreements were
signed all of sudden the respondents have
stipulated that all the p