HIGH COURT OF PATNA
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission – Appellant
Versus
Shashi Bhushan Yadav – Respondent
L.P.A 1311/2019
['Satyabir Bharti', '', 'ALOK CHANDRA', 'SARVESK KUMAR SINGH AAG']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Letters Patent Appeal No.1311 of 2019
In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.727 of 2018
======================================================
1.
The Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna. Through its Chairman.
2.
The Chairman The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College
Compound, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna.
3.
The Secretary The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College
Compound, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
Shashi Bhushan Yadav Son of Bholanath Yadav Resident of Village-
Maharaj Ke Tola, P.O.- Khawashpur, P.S.- Krishnagarh, District- Bhojpur at
Arrah.
2.
The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
4.
The Principal Secretary, Department of General Administration,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The Agriculture Production Commissioner Department of Agriculture,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
6.
The Director Agriculture Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
7.
The District Agriculture Officer, Bhojpur, District- Bhojpur at Arrah.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the State
:
Mr.Sarvesh Kr. Singh AAG-13
Mr.Ravi Kumar Ac to AAG-13
For Commission(BSSC) : Satyabir Bharti Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Nityanand Mishra
Mr. Alok Abhinav
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
ORAL JUDGMENT
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)
Date : 07-11-2022
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant L.P.A, is by the Bihar Staff Selection
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1311 of 2019 dt.07-11-2022
2/15
Commission against the order of the learned single Judge dated
17.05.2019 passed in C.W.J.C 727 of 2018.
3. Brief facts of the case are that Commission
issued an advertisement on 29.04.2015 in filling up number of
Agricultural Coordinator of post. In this regard, counselling was
undertaken during the period from 18.01.2016 to 09.05.2016.
The respondent-Shashi Bhushan Yadav was invited for
counselling on 05.05.2016. Even though his application is under
reservation category namely Backward Class(Yadav) read with
Non Creamy Layer. As on the date of counselling that is on
05.05.2016, he has failed to furnish Non Creamy Layer
certificate. Therefore, the respondent-petitioner name has been
considered other than the Non Creamy Layer category. Merit list
was notified on 05.08.2016, thereafter, certain correspondence
was made by the petitioner-Commission. Ultimately, the
Commission rejected the respondent’s claim that he had not filed
Non Creamy Layer certificate as on 05.05.2016 the date on
which Counselling was held. Such decision was communicated
to the respondent vide decision dated 22.07.2017. Feeling
aggrieved and dissatisfied with the decision of the commission
dated 22.07.2017, respondent filed C.W.J.C No. 727 of 2018. It
was allowed in his favour, hence, the present L.P.A on behalf of
Patna High Court L.P.A No.1311 of 2019 dt.07-11-2022
3/15
the Commission.
4. Learned Counsel for the Commission
vehemently contended that learned single Judge has committed
error in allowing the C.W.J.C No. 727 of 2018, while ignoring
clause 4(2) of the advertisement dated 29.04.2015 by which
candidates have been given instruction to furnish respective
certificates as on the date of counselling. In the present case,
respondent has not furnished the Non Creamy Layer certificate
on 05.05.2016, the date on which he was subjected to
counselling. It is further submitted that learned single Judge has
relied on Hon’ble Supreme Court’s decision (2016) 4 SCC 754
(Ram Kumar Gijroya Vs. Delhi Subordinate Servic