HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava
RAMDEV SAHANI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. MISC./69866/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69866 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2019 Thana- PAKRIDAYAL District- East Champaran
======================================================
1.
Ramdev Sahani, aged about 42 years, Male, Son of Baidnath Sahani,
Resident of Village- Jagatiya, P.S.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran.
2.
Pratap Sahani, aged about 32 years, Male, Son of Baidnath Sahani, Resident
of Village- Jagatiya, P.S.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran.
3.
Anil Sahani, aged about 26 years, Male, Son of Babulal Sahani, Resident of
Village- Jagatiya, P.S.- Pakaridayal, District- East Champaran.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners
:
Mr. Anuj Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party
:
Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava, A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR
SRIVASTAVA
ORAL ORDER
2
27-11-2019
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with
Pakaridayal P. S. Case No. 177 of 2019, registered for the
offence punishable under Section 30(A) of the Bihar Excise and
Prohibition Act, 2016.
Police having got confidential information made raid
and recovered illicit liquor. Police claimed that petitioners were
selling illicit liquor and managed to escape from there, when hut
was raided.
Submission on behalf of the petitioners is that alleged
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69866 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019
2/2
recovery has not been made either from possession or from
house of the petitioners. Moreover, there is nothing in the FIR to
show who disclosed the name of the petitioners.
Although, anticipatory bail petition for the offence
under the provision of excise act is not maintenable but in view
of the aforesaid submission, it appears that prima facie no
offence of excise act is made out against the petitioners and,
accordingly, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is
ordered that the petitioners, above named, in the event of their
arrest/surrender within six weeks from the date of receipt of this
order to the court concerned, shall be released on bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
learned Special Judge, Excise Act, East Champaran, Motihari in
connection with Pakaridayal P. S. Case No. 177 of 2019, subject
to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the CrPC.
Rajeev Kumar/-
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.