HIGH COURT OF PATNA
BINDESHWARI SAH – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 72901/2019
['Rajesh Kumar Pandey', 'Ram Bilash Roy Raman', '', 'Amrendra Kumar']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72901 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2019 Thana- BIHPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
1.
BINDESHWARI SAH, Son of Late Jamuna Sah.
2.
Pappu Sah, Son of Bindeshwari Sah.
Both Residents of Village - Jhandapur, P.S.-Bihpur (Jhandapur),
District-Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar,
2. Mithilesh Kumar, aged about 22 years, Male, son of late Vijay Sah, resident
of village- Jhandapur, P.S.- Bihpur, District- Bhagalpur.
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioners
:
Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pandey
For the Opposite Party
:
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
7
22-12-2021
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
This application for anticipatory bail arises out of
Bihpur (Jhandapur) P.S. Case No. 133 of 2019 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 147, 323, 342, 379, 420, 120-
B, 406, 467, 471, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The petitioners are father and son. Allegation has
been made that petitioner no.1 has cheated the informant by
getting a sale deed executed surreptitiously by late Jamuna Sah
thereby, denying the informant’s share in the land.
When this fact came to the knowledge of the
informant he went and demanded his share, which was refused
by petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.2 misbehaved with him.
On 18.12.2019, a coordinate Bench of this Court
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72901 of 2019(7) dt.22-12-2021
2/3
had passed the following order:-
“Petitioners are directed to array the informant as
opposite party no.2 during the course of the day.
Issue notice to newly added opposite party no.2 by
ordinary as well as speed post for which requisites
etc. must be filed one week after winter vacation.
Rule is made returnable within four weeks.
List this case on 11.02.2020 under the appropriate
heading.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioners that the petitioners are ready to return
the property of the informant, hence, no coercive
step shall be taken against the petitioners in
connection with Bihpur (Jhandapur) Case No.133
of 2019 pending before the learned A.C.J.M.-Ist,
Naugachia, Bhagalpur.”
Thereafter, the petitioners have not acted as per
their own undertaking given before this Court on 18.12.2019
and they are not ready to return the property to the informant.
It seems that the petitioners had given undertaking
in the order dated 18.12.2019 only with an intention to get the
interim protection from this Court. The Court cannot be taken
for a ride by such kind of litigants and strict view should be
taken in such type of cases. Though the case was adjourned on a
number of occasions to comply with the undertaking given by
the petitioners but they have not complied their own
undertaking.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72901 of 2019(7) dt.22-12-2021
3/3
In that view of the matter, this anticipatory bail
application filed on behalf of the petitioners is dismissed with a
cost of Rs.5000/-.
The petitioners are directed to surrender in the
court below within four weeks from today.
pawan/-
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
U
T