HIGH COURT OF PATNA
SUNIL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CR. MISC. 71822/2019
['Sunil Kumar', '', 'Navin Sharma', 'Dr Indiwar Kumari']
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71822 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-559 Year-2019 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
======================================================
SUNIL SINGH Son of Late Rajdeo Singh Resident of Village -
Purushottampur, P.S.- Mufassil in the district of Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s
:
Mr.Sunil Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s :
Dr. Indiwar Kumari
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
8
17-06-2020
The matter has been taken up through virtual Court
proceeding.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in jail since 24.7.2019 in a
case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 8 and
21(a) of the NDPS Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
The prosecution case, as per the written report of Manindra
Kumar, S.I. of Police, submitted to the SHO, Ara Nawada Police
Station is to the effect that on 23.7.2019 at 6.00 P.M., a
confidential information was received that one person is selling
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71822 of 2019(8) dt.17-06-2020
2/8
Heroin near Maharaja College. Consequently, a raiding team
was constituted and raid was laid and one persons was
apprehended who disclosed his name as Dinesh Prasad. On
search being made, from the left pocket of his shirt, 4 gram
white brown material appearing to be Herion, was recovered.
Thereafter, samples of 2 gram each was made of the seized
material. During enquiry, co-accused Dinesh Prasad suggested
that he brought Heroin from Sunil Singh (petitioner), thereafter
the room of the petitioner was raided and from his house,
Acetanilide 98.5% -500 gram kept in a white and blue coloured
box on which chemical name of the material was mentioned,
Amonium Chloride kept in three white colour boxes, each
containing 500 gram, Amonium Chloride 400 gram kept in
another white coloured box and Sodium Chloride 500 gram kept
in a white blue coloured box and other white material weighing
100 gram were recovered, leading to registration of the present
case.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the
seized materials are neither psychotropic substance nor narcotic
drug. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition
that the petitioner is not having any criminal antecedent. The
investigation has already been concluded and there is no
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71822 of 2019(8) dt.17-06-2020
3/8
likelihood of the trial being concluded in near future.
Learned APP, however, submits that one of the seized
articles (Acetanilide) finds place in the table given under the Act
and its small quantity is 0.005 gram but she fails to convince the
Court that the chemical name of the said item does not tally with
the seizurelist. Learned APP is also unable to explain as under
what circumstances the samples were not sent to the Forensic
Science Laboratory for its chemical examination.
The Act governs the possession, cultivation, production,
manufacture, sale, purchase, transport, export, import of
narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance. Narcotic drug has
been defined in Section 2 (xiv) of the Act, which reads as
follows:
“2 (xiv) "narcotic drug" means coca leaf,
cannabis (hemp), opium, poppy straw and includes
all manufactured drugs;”
The prosecution case does not suggest that the seized
articles were either coca leaf, cannabis (hemp), opium poppy
straw or any other manufactured drugs. The informant has
mentioned the name of seized articles what is mentioned on the
box containing the seized article. It is not expected from a police
officer who is not a chemical expert to know the chemical
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71822 of 2