HIGH COURT OF PATNA
Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan
GOPAL RAI – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent
CR. APP (SJ)/5668/2019
ANTICIPATORY BAIL - SC/ST ACT - ABUSE AND ASSAULT - NO PUBLIC VIEW - NO OFFENCE
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was accused of abusing and assaulting the informant and his family members, including snatching a gold chain from the informant's wife. The appellant claimed innocence and alleged false implication due to village politics.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the alleged incident did not take place in public view, and therefore the SC/ST Act was not applicable.
Issues: Whether the appellant committed the alleged offences; Whether the SC/ST Act was applicable in the case.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the SC/ST Act does not apply to incidents that do not occur in public view.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appellant's appeal and granted him anticipatory bail.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.5668 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2017 Thana- SC/ST District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
GOPAL RAI Son of Bishwanath Rai Resident of Village - Aadarsh Nagar,
P.S. - Sultanganj, Dist.- Bhagalpur
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Appellant/s
:
Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s
:
Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
ORAL ORDER
5
06-01-2022
Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned
Special Public Prosecutor for the State through virtual court
proceedings.
This is an appeal under section 14(A) 2 of the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act
(hereinafter in short referred to as the ‘SC/ST Act’) against the
refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated
18.11.2019, passed by learned IIIrd Additional District and
Sessions Judge-cum- Spl. Judge, Bhagalpur, in connection with
Bhagalpur SC/ST P.S. Case No.31 of 2017, registered under
sections 447, 341, 323, 504, 506, 379, 34 of the IPC and
sections 3(1)(R), 3(2)(Va) of the SC and ST Act.
Allegation against the appellant is of abusing by taking
caste name and assaulting the informant and his family
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5668 of 2019(5) dt.06-01-2022
2/3
members at his house. Further allegation is that he snatched the
gold chain of informant’s wife and when the informant wanted
to pacify the matter, he was slapped by the appellant.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that
the appellant is innocent and has not committed any offence. No
such occurrence as alleged ever taken place. Appellant has been
falsely implicated in the case due to dirty village politics and
oblique motive. There is general and omnibus allegation against
the appellant and other accused persons. The informant has
compromised the case from the other three co-accused. Slating
the informant in the name of caste is said to have been made at
the house of the appellant and not in public view, hence no
offence under SC/ST Act is made out against the appellant. The
injury report shows the injury as simple in nature. Appellant has
no criminal antecedent, as also mention in para-3 of the memo
of appeal.
Learned Spl. PP for the State opposed the prayer for
anticipatory bail by submitting that there is specific allegation
against the appellant of abusing the informant and his family
members.
From perusal of the prosecution case, it appears that no
SC/ST Act is applicable against the appellants as the occurrence
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.5668 of 2019(5) dt.06-01-2022
3/3
has not taken place in public view, hence, there is no
requirement of issuing notice upon the informant in this case,
which is otherwise required in a case under the SC/ST Act.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the
appellant named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender
before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks
from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail
bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned
IIIrd Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum- Spl. Judge,
Bhagalpur, in connection with Bhagalpur SC/ST P.S. Case
No.31 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under
section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this
appeal is allowed.
pallavi/-
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
U
T
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.