Advocates:
['Parth Gaurav', '', 'Subhash Chandra Mishra', 'Amol Raj', 'Sangeeta Sharma', 'Umesh Kumar Singh', 'Madan Jeet Kumar']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.37 of 2020

======================================================

Ratan Gupta S/o Late Brij Bhushan Gupta Resident of Mohalla- Nawada,

Village- Ara, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur at present R/o Quarter No.

174, D-2, West Kidwai Nagar, Sarojini Nagar, West Delhi

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Adeya Prasad Singh S/o Late Shivraj Singh Resident of Mohalla- Nawada,

Village- Ara, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

2.

Raju Gupta S/o Late Brij Bhushan Gupta Resident of Mohalla- Nawada,

Village- Ara, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

3.

Rinki @ Ruby Pradhan D/o Late Brij Bhushan Gupta Resident of Mohalla-

Nawada, Village- Ara, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

4.

Pinki @ Preeti Azad D/o Late Brij Bhushan Gupta Resident of Mohalla-

Nawada, Village- Ara, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

5.

Basuki Nath Prasad S/o name not known Advocate, Civil Court, Ara

6.

Avinash Prasad Singh S/o Late Shivraj Singh Resident of Mohalla-

Powerganj, Ara, East of Kali Sthan, P.s.- Ara Nawada, District- Bhojpur

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================

Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s

:

Mr. Parth Gaurav, Advocate

For the Respondent/s

:

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, Advocate

Mr. Madan Jeet Kumar, Advocate

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA

ORAL ORDER

3

27-06-2022

Heard Mr. Parth Gaurav, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr. Mrigendra Kumar learned counsel for the

Plaintiff-Respondent No. 1.

The petitioner/defendant is aggrieved by the order

dated 29.08.2019 passed by the learned Munsif-2, Ara, Bhojpur,

in Title Suit No. 50 of 2019/421 of 2019, by which, the

Advocate Commissioner has been appointed without notice to

the petitioner.

Patna High Court C.Misc. No.37 of 2020(3) dt.27-06-2022

2/2

Mr. Mrigendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for

the Plaintiff-Respondent 1^st set submits that Defendant-

Respondent 2^nd set is the formal party and the petitioner is

defendant No. 1 is the contesting defendant. As such, no notice

need be issued to Defendant-Respondent 2^nd set. He further

submits that it is correct that order for appointment of Pleader

Commissioner was passed by the learned court below without

giving any notice to the Plaintiff-defendant No. 1/Respondent

1^st set..

In view of the submission made by learned Counsel

for the parties, the part of the impugned order to the extent

appointing Advocate Commissioner and his report dated

04.10.2019 is set aside and the matter is remitted back to the

learned Court below to pass a fresh order on a petition filed by

the Plaintiff-Respondent 1^st set on 29.08.2019 after giving

notice and after hearing the defendants in the Suit.

Accordingly, this application stands allowed.

S.Ali/-

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)

U