HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
AMOL BALA SAHEB GARADE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 41/2022
['PARAS MANI SHRIWAS', '', 'I P JANGDE', 'Vishvanath Prasad Shrivas', 'A G']
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 41 of 2022
Amol Bala Saheb Garade S/o Shri Bala Saheb Garade Aged
About 29 Years R/o Village Pimpalkuntey, Beside Of Water Tank,
Pune Civil And Revenue District Pune Maharastra
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police
Station Basana, Civil And Revenue District Mahasamund
Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
Mr. Paras Mani Shriwas, counsel for the applicant.
Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, GA for the State/respondent.
_______________________________________________________________
Hon'ble Shri Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari,
Order on Board
10.02.2022
1.
The applicant has preferred this first bail application under
Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail as he is in
custody in connection with crime No. 606 of 2021 registered in
Police Station Basana, District Mahasamund, CG for offence
punishable under Sections 419, 467 and 468/34 IPC.
2.
The case of the prosecution in brief is that the co-accused
Parasram Kathare @ Parmeshwar Sonkamle is driver of the
vehicle truck No. K.A. 16-C 6936 which was entrusted for
transportation of aluminum amounting Rs.64,28,909/- but during
the transit, with the conspiracy of the present applicant the said
article was unloaded in the field of the present applicant.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further
submits that the applicant has no direct involvement in the crime
in question and he has no knowledge about the aluminum rods
which has been kept in his field therefore, he may be enlarged on
bail.
4.
Per contra, learned State counsel strongly opposes the bail
application.
5.
Considering the rival submission made by the parties, and
also keeping in mind the seriousness of the allegation and the
manner in which the article was unloaded with the conspiracy of
the present applicant, this Court is of the opinion that the applicant
has no case for regular bail at this stage.
6.
Accordingly, the application is liable to be rejected and is
hereby rejected.
Sd/-
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Judge
PAWAN