SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
SADHURAM and ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Order on Board

30/09/2019

1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated

25/07/2011 passed in Sessions Trial No. 117/2010 by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Bastar at Jagdalpur (C.G.), whereby the Appellants have been convicted under Section 324 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs. 500/- with default stipulation.

2. Facts of the case are that on 10/08/2007 at about 7:00 pm, Complainant Sukhman (PW8) was taking food with Bhagat Ram in his house. It is alleged the Appellants and acquitted accused Ulman came there and called Sukhman. Thereafter, the Appellants assaulted him by knives, due to that he sustained injuries on his neck. FIR (Ex.P-1) has been lodged by Bhagat Ram. On the basis of said, offence has been registered. During course of investigation, on the basis of memorandum statement of Appellants, one knife has been seized from Appellant Sadhuram vide Ex.P-7 and one knife has been seized from Appellant Bhagatu vide Ex.P-8. Statement of witnesses have been recorded under Section 161 of the Cr.P.C. After investigation, a charge-sheet has been filed under Section 307/34 of the IPC. Trial Court framed the charges. As many as 9

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top