HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Jhitru Dead Through Lrs. Smt. Balo Bai(DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish – Respondent
SA 74/2004
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 74 of 2004
1. Jhitru (Dead) Through LRs.
1. (i) Smt. Balo Bai, W/o Jhitru, Aged about 70 Years,
1. (ii) Dhaneshwar, S/o Jhitru, Aged about 29 Years,
1. (iii) Devendra, S/o Jhitru, Aged about 26 Years,
1. (iv) Umesh, S/o Jhitru, Aged about 21 Years,
All the above legal heirs are R/o Village Balikonta, Tehsil
Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
1. (v) Smt. Chanda, D/o Jhitru, Aged about 21 Years, R/o
Village Somda, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar
(Chhattisgarh)
2. Rupdhar S/o Shri Mahadev, R/o Gram Balikonta, Tah.
Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
3. Jaldhar (Dead) Through LRs.
3 . (1) Smt. Sona Bai Wd/o Late Jaldhar
3 . (2) Jagdev S/o Late Jaldhar,
3 . (3) Jaibati Baghel D/o Late Jaldhar,
3 . (4) Kartik Baghel S/o Late Jaldhar,
All R/o Gram Balikonta, Tah. Jagdalpur, District Bastar,
(Chhattisgarh)
3. (5) Maheshwar Baghel (Died) (Deleted)
4. Shridhar S/o Shri Mahadev,
5. Jugdhar S/o Shri Mahadev,
All R/o Gram Balikonta, Tah. Jagdalpur, District Bastar,
(Chhattisgarh) ...........
(Defendants No. 1 To 5)
---- Appellants
Versus
1. Jagdish S/o Late Gada,
2. Manu S/o Late Gada,
3. Mangaldei S/o Late Gada,
All are R/o Gram Balikonta, Tah. Jagdalpur, District Bastar,
(Chhattisgarh)
4. Ushmi Bai (Dead) - (Deleted)
5. Dashai Bai W/o Shri Sukhdev, R/o Gram Niyanagar, Tah.
Jagdalpur, District Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
S.A. No. 74 of 2004
2
6. Ikshawati W/o Shri Kumo, R/o Gram Kinjoli ...........(Plaintiffs
No. 1 To 6)
7. Sukri (Dead) Through L.R.
7 . (i) Badei Bai, W/o Balram, Aged about 28 Years, R/o Village
Balikonta Chhottapara, Tehsil Jagdalpur, District Bastar,
(Chhattisgarh)
8. Balo W/o Tinu, R/o Gram Tambakoni, Tah. Jagdalpur,
District Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
9. Dayawati R/o Gram Koraguda, Tah. Jagdalpur, District
Bastar (Chhattisgarh)
10.Koi S/o Shri Mahadev, R/o Gram- Balikonta, Tah. Jagdalpur,
District Bastar, (Chhattisgarh)
11.State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Collector, Bastar,
(Chhattisgarh) ........... (Defendants No. 6 To 10)
---- Respondents
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellants
:
Shri B.P. Sharma & Shri
Hari Agrawal, Advocates
For Respondents No.1 to 10
:
Shri T.N. Dubey & Shri
Vijay Kumar Mishra,
Advocates
For the State
:
Shri Bhaskar Payasi, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judgment on Board
24/08/2016
1.
The substantial questions of law involved, framed, and to be
answered in the defendant's second appeal are as under:
“1.
Whether the first appellate Court is justified in
revoking the partition already made by the ancestors of
the parties on the ground of unequal share in the suit
S.A. No. 74 of 2004
3
property, ignoring the fact that there is no allegation of
fraud and unfair dealing in the partition already made?
2.
Whether the first appellate Court is justified in
revoking the partition which was become final in the life
time of the ancestors of the parties?”
(For the sake of convenience the parties will be hereinafter
referred as per their status shown in the plaint before the trial
Court).
2.
The following essential facts which are required for
answering the substantial question of law are as under:
2.1.
The following genealogical tree will demonstrate the
relationship among the parties.
FAMILY TREE
(As mentioned in Plaint)
Libru (dead)
|
______________________________________________
|
|
|
|
Hatbal
Ganpat
Sampat
Nari aka Dhansingh
|
|
__ |______________________
|
|
|
|
|
Laxminath Sukru Sukram
Mahadev
Teerath (Buranda)
|
|
__________ |____________
|_______________
|
|
|
|
Sitaram
Gada
Mosu
|
|
|
Mangal Dai (wife)-P3
|
|
|
______________ |__________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.