HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
INDARSAI BHUARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ANR – Respondent
WPS 2582/2010
['AJAY SHRIVASTAVA', 'BK CHAKRABARTY', '', 'G P MATHUR', 'SATYA KUMAR MANDLOI', 'VINOD KUMAR SHARMA', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No.2582 of 2010
Indarsai Bhuarya, S/o Shri Navalsingh Bhuarya, Aged about 53 years,
working as Lecturer at Govt. Higher Secondary School, Mangchuwa,
District Durg, R/o Village Bharritola, Post Mangchuwa, Block & Tehsil
Daundi Lohara, District Durg (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education
Department, D.K.S. Bhawan, Raipur (C.G.)
2. The Director/Commissioner, Lok Shikshan Sanchanalaya, Raipur
(C.G.)
---- Respondents
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioner:
Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate.
For Respondents/State: Mr. Avinash Singh, Panel Lawyer.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
19/07/2021
1. Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through video
conferencing.
2. Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner, would submit that the petitioner was promoted on the post
of Lecturer (Political Science) by order dated 28-8-2009, but by the
impugned order dated 22-4-2010 (Annexure P-1), his order of
promotion has been cancelled without giving opportunity of hearing to
him which is in teeth of the principles of natural justice and is liable to
be set aside.
3. Mr. Avinash Singh, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State /
respondents, would support the impugned order and would submit
that the petitioner was not trained and qualified for the post of Lecturer
2
(Political Science), therefore, his promotion order has been set aside.
4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and considered their rival
submissions made herein-above and also went through the record
with utmost circumspection.
5. Undisputedly, the petitioner was promoted on the post of Lecturer
(Political Science) on 28-8-2009 in the pay-scale of ₹ 5,500-9,000/-
(revised pay band ₹ 9,300-34,800/-, grade pay ₹ 4,300/-), but by the
impugned order, his promotion order has been cancelled on the
ground of not being trained on the said post. Once the order of
promotion has been granted in favour of the petitioner, that could not
have been withdrawn without affording reasonable opportunity of
being heard and without issuing notice to the petitioner, as it involves
civil consequences of taking his right to hold the post of Lecturer
(Political Science). Accordingly, the impugned order dated 22-4-2010
(Annexure P-1), qua the petitioner, is set aside. However, the
respondents are at liberty to proceed in accordance with law.
6. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated herein-above. No
order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
Soma