SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KANGALU – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
['SANTOSH BHARAT', 'SMT DURGESH GUPTA', '', 'PRAFULL N BHARAT', 'A G']

-1-

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 975 OF 1999

Kangalu, S/o Ramprasad, aged 27 years, R/o Kondagaon, PS

Kondagaon, District Bastar.

… Appellant

Versus

State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh)

... Respondent

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1694 OF 1999

Sadik Khan @ Guddu, S/o Shahjad Khan, age 26 years, R/o

Sarangipal, PS Kondagaon, District Bastar.

… Appellant

Versus

State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh)

... Respondent

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1695 OF 1999

Salim Khan, S/o Sayyed Khan, age 22 years, R/o Mutton Market, PS

Kondagaon, District Bastar.

… Appellant

Versus

State of Madhya Pradesh (now Chhattisgarh)

... Respondent

Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate, for the Appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos.

975 of 1999 and 1695 of 1999.

Mr. Vishnu Koshta, Advocate, for the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.

1694 of 1999.

Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Deputy Government Advocate, for the State.

Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

Judgment on Board

Per NAVIN SINHA, C.J.

15/10/2015

1.

The Appellants stand convicted under Section 302/34 IPC to life

imprisonment with fine of Rs. 5000/- each, in the event of failure to pay

w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top