HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SMT.SHARDA RANI CHHABADA Since Dead Thr. Lrs. a Munshi Ram Chhabda(DECEASED) – Appellant
Versus
RAJJAN PRASAD (DEAD) THROUGH LRS(DECEASED) – Respondent
FA 398/1996
['PREM FRINCIS', 'SANJAY DWIVEDI', 'ROHIT SHUKLA', 'R DUBEY', 'GREESHM JAIN', 'SM MENDHEKAR', '', 'ASHISH SHRIVASTAVA', 'ANANT BAJPAI', 'AMRITO DAS', 'AFROJ KHAN', 'ANAND VERMA', 'RAKESH DUBEY', 'AMIT VERMA', 'ANURAG VERMA', 'ANIMESH VERMA', 'VIMLESH BAJPAI', '', 'MADHU NISHA SINGH', 'G V KRISHNA RAO', 'JAMEEL AKHTAR LOHANI', 'SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT', 'NIRUPAMA BAJPAI', 'B P GUPTA', 'Richa Jain']
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
First Appeal No. 398 of 1996
Judgment reserved on : 13.11.2018
Judgment delivered on : 22.01.2019
1. Smt. Sharda Rani Chhabada Since Dead Through LRs.
1(a)
Munshi Ram Chhabda, H/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged
About 77 Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
1(b)
Mangal Sen Chhabda, S/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged
About 54 Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
1(c)
Dr. Anil Kumar Chhabda, S/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged
About 48 Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
1(d)
Sushil Kumar Chhabda, S/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged
About 46 Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
1(e)
Yashpal Chhabda, S/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged About 44
Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
1(f)
Harish Kumar Chhabda, S/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged
About 42 Years, R/o. Jagat Agency, Telipara, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
1(g)
Smt. Usha Saluja, D/o. Late Sharda Rani Chhabda, Aged About 50
Years, W/o. Prem Saluja, C/o. Shri Anand Medical Store, Opposite
Bhandhari Mill Gate, Snehlata Ganj, Indore M.P.
2. Anoop Kumar Chhabda, S/o. Shri Munshiram Chhabda, Aged About 30
Years, R/o. Telipara, Bilaspur, Tahsil & District Bilaspur (M.P.) Now
Chhattisgarh
---- Appellants
Versus
1. Rajjan Prasad (Dead) Through LRs:
1(a)
Smt. Santibai Shukla, Wd/o. Late Rajjan Prasad, Aged About 60
Years.
1(b)
Vikash Shukla, S/o. Late Rajjan Prasad, Aged About 48 Years.
1(c)
Sanjay Shukla, S/o. Late Rajjan Prasad, Aged About 60 Years.
1(d)
Ajay Shukla, S/o. Late Rajjan Prasad, Aged About 60 Years.
All are R/o. Near Ganesh Trading Company, Telipara, District Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh
2. Devi Prasad Tiwari (Died) Through LRs :
2(ii)A. Ravi Bhushan, S/o. Late Shri Jyoti Bhushan, Aged About 23 Years.
2(ii)B. Sashi Bhushan, S/o. Late Shri Jyoti Bhushan, Aged About 26 Years
2(ii)C. Smt. Pushpa, W/o. Late Shri Jyoti Bhushan, Aged About 38 Years.
2
All are R/o. Budhar Road Rama Bai Hospital Road, Tahsil
Suhagpur, District Shahdol (M.P.)
---- Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Appellants
:
Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Advocate
For Respondent No.1
:
Mr. B.P.Gupta, Advocate
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
C.A.V. Judgment
22.01.2019
1.
The instant appeal is against the judgment and decree dated
23.08.1996 passed in Civil Suit No.10/1991 by the District Judge,
Bilaspur, whereby the judgment & decree for specific performance
has been passed in favour of the plaintiff/ respondent No.1. The
present appeal is by the purchasers of the suit property.
2.
The facts of the case in brief is that, a suit was filed by Rajjan
Prasad, S/o. Shambhu Dayal (since deceased) that on 04.03.1991
an agreement was executed in between Rajjan Prasad (since
deceased) and Devi Prasad Tiwari (since deceased) whereby Devi
Prasad Tiwari agreed to sell half part of the superstructure
comprised Plot No.87 recorded at Sheet No.26 admeasuring half
of 2485 sq.ft. for a sale consideration of Rs.2 Lakhs as Rajjan
Prasad was in occupation of the suit house as tenant. Out of the
total sale consideration, Rs.20,000/- was paid as an advance as
earnest money and it was agreed that till 15.04.1991 sale deed
would be executed in favour of the plaintiff. It is further pleaded
that before the date of sale a notice was received by plaintiff on
13.03.1991 and allegations were clamped that the son of the then
plaintiff Rajjan Prasad has obtained signature on the papers by
fraud and further it was pleaded that thereafter the defendant
3
No.1, the seller, contacted for execution of the sale deed and it
was stated that the plaintiff was ready and willing to execute the
sale deed by payment of remaining amount of Rs.1,80,000/-.
S