HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
ANSHUMAN KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 343/2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 343 of 2022
1. Anshuman Kedia S/o Shivkumar Kedia, Aged About 40 Years Proprietor-
Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Kendra, Podi- Uproda, Tahsil Podi-
Uproda, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare
Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh),
2. The Collector, District Korba (Chhattisgarh),
3. The Assistant Drugs Controller, Food And Drugs Administration, Korba,
District Korba Chhattisgarh,
4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh
5. The Block Medical Officer, Community Health Center, Podi-Uproda, District
Korba Chhattisgarh.
6. Gopal Ban Goswami, Through Block Medical Officer, Community Health
Center, Podi-Uproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Shri S.R. J. Jaiswal, Advocate.
For State
:
Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order On Board
19.01.2022
1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be
the inaction on the part of the respondents in not taking an appropriate
decision on the claim of the petitioner for allotment of a shop within the
hospital premises of the Community Health Center Podi-Uproda.
2
2. The petitioner seems to be also aggrieved of the action on the part of
the respondent No. 3 who has directed the respondent No. 5 to select
10x12 sq. mtr., place for construction and running of a medical shop for
the respondent No. 6.
3. This Court at the outset is of the opinion that the petitioner's claim is
also pending consideration before the authorities and the writ petition
as of now can be disposed of directing the respondents No. 2 to 5 to
take an appropriate decision on the application that the petitioner has
made for allotment of a shop strictly in accordance with the scheme, if
any, under which the petitioner has applied.
4. Moreover, the authorities while taking a decision would also consider
as to how the order has been passed so far as granting of place to the
respondent No. 6 for establishment of a shop within the said premises
of the Community Health Center. Let an appropriate decision be taken
at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of
receipt of copy of this order.
5. The present writ petitioner accordingly stands disposed of.
T
Sd/-
P. Sam Koshy
Judge
Jyoti