SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
ANSHUMAN KEDIA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 343/2022



1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 343 of 2022

1. Anshuman Kedia S/o Shivkumar Kedia, Aged About 40 Years Proprietor-

Pradhan Mantri Bhartiya Jan Aushadhi Kendra, Podi- Uproda, Tahsil Podi-

Uproda, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare

Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh),

2. The Collector, District Korba (Chhattisgarh),

3. The Assistant Drugs Controller, Food And Drugs Administration, Korba,

District Korba Chhattisgarh,

4. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh

5. The Block Medical Officer, Community Health Center, Podi-Uproda, District

Korba Chhattisgarh.

6. Gopal Ban Goswami, Through Block Medical Officer, Community Health

Center, Podi-Uproda, District Korba Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Shri S.R. J. Jaiswal, Advocate.

For State

:

Shri Aditya Bhardwaj, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

Order On Board

19.01.2022

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition seems to be

the inaction on the part of the respondents in not taking an appropriate

decision on the claim of the petitioner for allotment of a shop within the

hospital premises of the Community Health Center Podi-Uproda.

2

2. The petitioner seems to be also aggrieved of the action on the part of

the respondent No. 3 who has directed the respondent No. 5 to select

10x12 sq. mtr., place for construction and running of a medical shop for

the respondent No. 6.

3. This Court at the outset is of the opinion that the petitioner's claim is

also pending consideration before the authorities and the writ petition

as of now can be disposed of directing the respondents No. 2 to 5 to

take an appropriate decision on the application that the petitioner has

made for allotment of a shop strictly in accordance with the scheme, if

any, under which the petitioner has applied.

4. Moreover, the authorities while taking a decision would also consider

as to how the order has been passed so far as granting of place to the

respondent No. 6 for establishment of a shop within the said premises

of the Community Health Center. Let an appropriate decision be taken

at the earliest preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of

receipt of copy of this order.

5. The present writ petitioner accordingly stands disposed of.

T

Sd/-

P. Sam Koshy

Judge

Jyoti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top