SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIDYADHAR MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['P P SAHU', 'K K DEWANGAN', '', 'SHAYAM SUNDER LAL TEKCHANDANI', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 947 of 2012

Vidyadhar Mishra S/o Satyadeo Mishra, aged about 68 years, R/o In

front of Railway Station, Raipur, C.G.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Chief Information Commissioner, Chhattisgarh State Information

Commission, Raipur (C.G.)

2. Collector Raipur, District Raipur, Cg

3. Public Information Officer, Diversion Branch District Office, Raipur, Cg

4. Officer On Special Duty, Land Diversion Office Collectorate Campus,

Raipur Cg

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

Shri P.P. Sahu, Advocate

For Respondent/State

Shri S. Majid Ali, PL

For Respondent No.1

Shri S.S. Lal Tekchandani, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

Order On Board By

26/10/2015

1.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is

heard finally.

2.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the Chief

Information Commissioner, Chhattisgarh on 31.01.2012, whereby his

second appeal under Section 19 of the Right to Information Act, 2005

(For short ' the RTI Act') has been dismissed.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner had

moved an application before the Collector,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top