Advocates:
['Ghanshyam Panday', '', 'MANISH THAKUR', 'AG', '', 'PANKAJ AGRAWAL']

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Writ Petition (S) No. 912 of 2018

Bhuwan Prakash Kaiwartya Rahi S/o Shri Chandra Prakash Kaiwartya,

Aged About 58 Years, Working As In Charge Executive Engineer And

Posted At Municipal Corporation Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,

District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Local

Administration And Development Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Naya

Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Nagar Palik Nigam ( Municipal Corporation ) Raipur Through Commissioner

Nagar Palik Nigam Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,

Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.,

District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Additional Commissioner, Nagar Palik Nigam Raipur District Raipur

Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Petitioners

:

Mr. Ghanshyam Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents

:

Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Senior Adv. with Ms. Deepali

Dubey, Advocate.

For State

:

Ms. Sunita Jain, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order On Board

29/01/18

1.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner would submit

though the petitioner's suspension has been revocked but one annual

increment has not been paid to him till date and the juniors in service to the

petitioner have been promoted to the next higher post, for which the

petitioner has already made a representation before the respondent

authorities but it has not been considered and decided till date.

2

2.

Be that as it may, the respondents No. 2 and 3 are directed to

consider the case of the petitioner for grant of one annual increment and

promotion, if any. The petitioner would also be at liberty to make a fresh

representation within a period of two weeks from today, that will be

considered by the respondent authorities after hearing the petitioner

expeditiously within a period of six weeks thereafter.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed

of. No order as to cost(s).

SD/-

(Sanjay K. Agrawal)

Judge

Priyanka