SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
Narendra Kumar Sonkar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Order on Board

01.09.2023

1. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the prescribed authority under the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred as the Act, 1976), dated 18.04.2017 whereby the application preferred by the petitioner has been rejected.

2. The facts of the case are that a property bearing survey Nos.799, 989, 856/3 admeasurig 4850 s.m., 2750 s.m. and 2450 s.m. situated at Village Chilhudih and Survey No. 1079 admeasuring 1210 s.m.

situated at Gudhiyar area and survey Nos. 191, 193, 194 situated at Village Kota admeasuring 12790 s.m., 4050 s.m., 3880 s.m. respectively, were purchased by the petitioner when he was minor through natural guardian his mother through registered sale deeds dated 14.03.1966, 30.01.1962, 21.02.1962 and 21.02.1962. A Ceiling Case No.19-A-90(C)(1) year 1984-85 was registered against the petitioner under the provisions of the Act 1976 for having land more than the ceiling limit. The competent authority issued a notice, on 30.01.1986 an enquiry was submitted before the competent authority to the effect that the petitioner was having 38399 s.m. more than the ceiling limit and a draft statement was issu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top