SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BABURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent


Advocates:
['DEEPAK JAIN', '', 'NEERAJ KUMAR MEHTA', 'S K GUHA', 'ATMA RAM YADAV', 'DR DAYA RAM DAYAL', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRA No. 1156 of 2003

1. Baburam, aged 32 years, son of Tulsiram Satnami, resident of

Village – Katalbod, Police Station-Bemetara, District Durg (C.G.)

2. Juggu alias Ram Prasad, aged 40 years, S/o Ramu Satnami,

resident of Village Katalbod, Police Station – Bemetara, District

Durg (C.G.) (Dead)

---- Appellants

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent

For Appellants

:

Shri Deepak Jain, Advocate.

For Respondent/State

:

Shri Ravindra Agrawal, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker

Hon'ble Shri Justice R.C.S. Samant

Judgment On Board By Justice Pritinker Diwaker

27/03/2017

This appeal arises out of the judgment of conviction and order of

sentence dated 31.1.1998 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge,

Bemetara, Distt. Durg in ST No.139/1988 convicting the appellant

Baburam under Sections 302 & 120B of IPC and sentencing him to

undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.200/- with default

stipulation.

02.

Brief facts of the case are that on 5.3.1988 at 8.30 pm an FIR

(Ex.P/7) was lodged by PW-4 Panchuram alleging therein that in the

previous year cattle of one of the deceased namely Premdas had

entered i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top