SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BALRAM KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MORISHA THAKUR', 'A G', '', 'AJIT SINGH', 'B P SHARMA', 'M L SAKAT']

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WP(227) No.6823 of 2009

Balram Kashyap S/o. Shri J.L. Kashyap, aged about 41 years,

R/o Lakhenagar, Raipur, Tahsil & Dist.-Raipur (CG)

----Petitioner

Versus

1. Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, Circuit Court at

Raipur (CG)

2. Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur (CG)

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur (CG)

4. Tahsildar Raipur, Distt.Raipur (CG)

5. Gangadhar Ramtekkar S/o Shobharam, R/o Engineering

College Premises, Raipur (CG)

6. Gurupal Singh Bhalla, R/o. Udaya Sahkari Grih Nirman

Samity, Tatibandh, Raipur (CG)

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Mr.Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate

For Res.No.1 to 4

:

Mr.Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

For Respondent No.5 :

Mr.Hari Agrawal, Advocate

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

Order on Board

29/08/2017

1.

The petitioner purchased the land bearing Kh.No.234 area

0.057 hectare situated at village Tatibandh, Distt.Raipur

and mutated his name in the revenue record. He made an

application for demarcation of the said land. Notice was

issued to Uday Grih Nirmal Samiti only and the revenue

inspector gave the report of demarcation of Kh.No.234.

On the basis of said report, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top