HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
OMPRAKASH @ POKASH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 1282/2022
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1282 of 2022
1. Omprakash @ Pokash S/o Shri Naindas Saytode Aged About
23 Years R/o Village Sundri (S) Police Station Palari District
Balodabazar (Chhattisgarh)
2. Ugrasen S/o Ghanshyam Navrange Aged About 41 Years R/o
Village Sundri (S) Police Station Palari District Balodabazar
(Chhattisgarh)
---- Applicants
Versus
•
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Palari, District
Balodabazar (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Applicants
: Shri Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate
For Respondent/State
: Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice
N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
21.3.2022.
1.
This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of the
Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicants, who have been
arrested on 02.02.2022 in connection with Crime No.58/2022
registered at Police Station Palari, Distt. Baloda Bazar (C.G.), for
the offence punishable under Sections 34(2) & 36 of the
Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
2.
Prosecution story, in brief, is that on 01.02.2022 Police of
Police Station Palari Distt. Baloda Bazar seized 178.200 bulk liters
of foreign liquor from illegal possession of 04 accused persons, out
of which, 79.020 bulk liters has been seized from applicant No.1
Omprakash @ Pokash and 45 bulk liters has been seized from
applicant No.2 Ugrasen .
3.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the
applicants are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this
case. He further submits that false seizure memo has been made
in this case and the applicants are in custody since 02.02.2022,
2
charge sheet has already been filed, hence, the applicants may be
released on bail.
4.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the State while
opposing the bail application submits that as per the case diary,
there are five criminal antecedents reported against applicant No.1
Omprakash, out of which, two cases are under the Excise Act and
two cases are under IPC; two criminal antecedents are also
reported against applicant No.2, out of which, one is under the
Excise Act and another is under the IPC.
5.
Considered the submission of learned counsel for the parties,
perused the case diary and the material available on record.
6.
Considering the entirety of the case, nature and gravity of
offence, quantity of liquor seized from the applicants and their
detention period and also considering that charge sheet has already
been filed, I feel inclined to grant bail to the applicants. Therefore,
the application under Section 439 of the CrPC is allowed. It is
directed that in the event of each of the applicant executing a
personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of the like
sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court for their
appearance before the concerned Court as and when directed by
the said court, they be released on bail.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/-
(N.K. Chandravanshi)
JUDGE
Bini