SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Pramod Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
['SUDEEP AGRAWAL', '', 'MANOJ PARANJPE', 'AVADHESH MISHRA', 'A G']

1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPS No.663 of 2016

Pramod Shukla S/o Hetram Shukla, Aged About 58 Years R/o Village

Saliyapara, Police Station, Post & Tahsil Pali, Civil And Revenue District

Korba Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban

Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Capital

Complex, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Joint Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development

Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Naya Raipur, District

Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Director, Urban Administration And Development, Raipur District Raipur

Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

5. Deputy Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent

For Petitioner:

Shri Manoj Paranjpe with Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocates

For Respondent/State:

Shri Ramakant Mishra, Dy.AG

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Order On Board

07/04/2016

Heard.

2.

A short issue arising for consideration in this petition as to whether the

impugned order constitutes deputation and secondly whether it could be done

without the consen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top