HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 1535 of 2021

Jyoti Kurre D/o Shri R.K. Kurre Aged About 38 Years Posted as Gramin

Swasthya Sanyojak, Up Swasthya Kendrya Matiyari, Samudayik Swasthya

Kendrya Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Department Of Health,

Family Welfare And Medical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan,

New Raipur (CG)

2. Directorate Of Medical Education, Through, Through its Director, Block -1,

Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, Bilaspur

Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For petitioner – Shri Ankit Pandey, Advocate.

For State – Shri Amrito Das, Addl.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order

24/03/2021

Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner wanted to

prosecute the B.Sc. Nursing Training Programme for which the No Objection

Certificate is required inasmuch as the petitioner is now posted at Primary Health

Centre, Bilha as a nurse. Learned counsel refers to Annexure P-5 and submits

that there were four ladies whose no objection was called from the Joint Director

by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Bilaspur by the letter dated 3/02/2021. In

respect of Smt. Sunita Shyam the remark column would show that she is not

interested to go for training, in respect of Meena Bunkar the remark column would

show that she has not been alloted counseling, in respect of Meena Ramteke the

remark column would show that she is not entitled as zoology was not subject of

class 12^th and in respect of petitioner Jyoti Kurre the necessary documents were

enclosed, however the no objection has not been issued. Learned counsel further

submits that since the cut of date would be 31/03/2021 no objection be considered

in terms of the letter dated 3/02/2021 (Annexure P-5) which is still awaited.

2.

Learned State counsel would submit that the grant of no objection would be

considered in accordance with the rules.

3.

Considering the fact the tenor of Annexure P-5 letter dated 3/02/2021

wherein in respect of Smt. Sunita Shyam it is shown that she is not interested to go

for training, in respect of Meena Bunkar she has not been alloted for counseling,

in respect of Meena Ramteke she is not entitled for training as she had no subject

of zoology in class 12, however in respect of the petitioner it appears that she has

all the necessary documents. The State may consider to issue no objection

certificate in accordance with rules in its own merit prior to 31/03/2021.

4.

With such observation, the petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Goutam Bhaduri)

JUDGE

gouri