SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Smt. Ishwari Sahu Pradhan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPS 2369/2016



Advocates:
['R S PATEL', '', 'KALAWATI PATEL', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPS No. 2369 of 2016

Smt. Ishwari Sahu (Pradhan) W/o Shri Suman Pradhan, Aged About

25 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) At Govt.

Primary School Siladi, Pusour, Block & Tahsil Pousour, Dist Raigarh

(Chhattisgarh)

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural

Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya

Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh).

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh District Raigarh

(Chhattisgarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kabeerdham, District

Kabeerdham (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pousour, District

Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

---- Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioner

:

Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate

For State

:

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, GA

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Order On Board

27/06/2016

Heard.

1.

Challenge in this petition to the transfer order dated 18.04.2016,

transferring the petitioner from Raigarh district to Kabirdham district

on the ground that the transfer has been made in violation of the

policy of posting husband and wife at the same place / station as

far as possible.

2.

It appears from the record that the petitioner has not made any

representation and straightway has filed the petition. However,

considering that in case the representation is made, but not

decided, it is directed for consideration of the representation only, I

deem it fit to issue a direction to respondent No.3 to examine the

representation for the subject to submitting representation within

10 days from today. If such representation is made, the same

should be decided within 15 days. A copy of the order dated

16.06.2016 passed by this Court in WPS No. 2170 of 2016 shall

also be placed along with the representation by the petitioner

before respondent No.3. For a period of three weeks, the

petitioner should not be compelled to proceed on transfer.

However, the direction is subject to the condition that the copy of

this order be placed by the petitioner before respondent No.3

within 10 days from today.

3.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava)

Judge

Chandra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top