SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUNSHINE CATERERS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES PROV.FUND APP.TRI.andANR – Respondent
WPL 6262/2011



Advocates:
['MANISH K BISHNOI', '', 'HARSH WARDHAN', 'DEVENDRA PATEL', 'PRADEEP SAKSENA', '', 'PANKHURI SAXENA', 'Y C SHARMA', 'VIVEK RATHORE', 'PUSHKAR SINHA']

W.P.(L)Nos.6264/2011, 6263/2011,

6262/2011 & 6261/2011

Page 1 of 29

AFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Writ Petition (L) No.6264 of 2011

Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., A Private Company

incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,

1956, having its registered office at Opposite Railway

Station, Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through its

Authorised Representative Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o

Late Shri G.D. Agrawal, aged about 47 years, R/o Road

No.4, Deepak Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ministry of

Labour and Employment, Government of India, 4th Floor,

Core-2, Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110 092.

2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the

Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office,

Nav Bharat Press Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

Writ Petition (L) No.6263 of 2011

Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., A Private Company

incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,

1956, having its registered office at Opposite Railway

Station, Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through its

Authorised Representative Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o

Late Shri G.D. Agrawal, aged about 47 years, R/o Road

No.4, Deepak Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ministry of

Labour and Employment, Government of India, 4th Floor,

Core-2, Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110 092.

2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the

Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office,

Nav Bharat Press Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

W.P.(L)Nos.6264/2011, 6263/2011,

6262/2011 & 6261/2011

Page 2 of 29

Writ Petition (L) No.6262 of 2011

Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., A Private Company

incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,

1956, having its registered office at Opposite Railway

Station, Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through its

Authorised Representative Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o

Late Shri G.D. Agrawal, aged about 47 years, R/o Road

No.4, Deepak Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ministry of

Labour and Employment, Government of India, 4th Floor,

Core-2, Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110 092.

2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the

Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office,

Nav Bharat Press Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

AND

Writ Petition (L) No.6261 of 2011

Sunshine Caterers Pvt. Ltd., A Private Company

incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act,

1956, having its registered office at Opposite Railway

Station, Station Road, Durg, Chhattisgarh. Through its

Authorised Representative Rakesh Kumar Agrawal, S/o

Late Shri G.D. Agrawal, aged about 47 years, R/o Road

No.4, Deepak Nagar, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Employees Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal, Ministry of

Labour and Employment, Government of India, 4th Floor,

Core-2, Scope Minar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi – 110 092.

2. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, Office of the

Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Regional Office,

Nav Bharat Press Complex, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner:

Mr. Manish K. Bishnoi and Mr. Harsh

W.P.(L)Nos.6264/2011, 6263/2011,

6262/2011 & 6261/2011

Page 3 of 29

Wardhan, Advocates.

For Respondent No.2: -

Mr. Pradeep Saksena, Advocate.

For Intervener: -

Mr. Y.C. Sharma and Mr. Govind

Dewangan, Advocates.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

CAV Order

04/01/2016

1. Superb question of law involved in this batch of writ

petitions is whether the Assistant Provident Fund

Commissioner is justified in holding that “Commission

Vendors” engaged by the petitioner/its predecessors-in-

interest for selling its

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top