HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
VYAS PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
PARAMJIT SINGH GANDHI – Respondent
CRMP 421/2022
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 421 of 2022
Vyas Pathak S/o late Shri Kanti Kumar Pathak Aged About 38 Years
R/o Behind Subhash Stadium, Ahmad Ji Colony Civil Line Raipur,
District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
Paramjit Singh Gandhi (As Per Memo Of Revision) S/o Shri
Gurudayal Singh Gandhi, R/o C-13/3 Near Wakf Board Office,
Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________
For petitioner – Shri Akhand Pratap Pandey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
10/03/2022
Heard.
1.
The short question involved in this case is that the petitioner who is
a complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments
Act his right to evidence was closed on 23/07/2019 against which a
revision was preferred which is bearing No.532/2019 wherein an
application was filed on 12/01/2022 that despite notice the respondent in
the revision is not appearing whereas before the trial court only short
dates are being given for examination of the accused. He would submit
that if the revision of the petitioner is allowed, then it will reopen the case
before the trial court to lead the evidence and in the eventuality the
statement of the accused is recorded and orders are passed, then in such
case the revision shall become infructuous.
2.
Having perused the order dated 23/07/2019 passed by the JMFC,
Raipur it shows that the right to lead evidence was closed for which a
revision was preferred which is pending bearing No.532/2019. In the
meanwhile, it is obvious that if the complaint case is adjudicated, then the
revision which is filed to reopen the evidence of the petitioner shall
become infructuous.
3.
Under the circumstances, it is directed that till the revision No.
532/2019 is decided on merits, there shall be stay of the proceeding of the
complaint case before the Judicial Magistrate. The revisional court may
decide the revision No. 532/2019 within a short span of time.
4.
With such observation, the petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri