HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
DILIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRMP 339/2021
['AKHILESH KUMAR', '', 'NEHA SHAH', 'Kishan lal Sahu', 'A G']
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No.339 of 2021
Dilip Singh, S/o Kishan Singh, Aged About
27 Years, R/o Budhbari Bazar, Near Ganesh
Pandal Korba, Tehsil Korba, District
Korba, Chhattisgarh
Petitioner
Versus
1.State of Chhattisgarh Through Police
Chowki CSEB, Police Station Kotwali
Korba, Chhattisgarh
2.The Collector, Korba, District Korba,
Chhattisgarh
Respondents
For Petitioner
Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Adv.
For Respondents
Mr. R. K. Bhagat, Dy. GA
Hon'ble Justice Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
24/03/2021
1.
The petitioner is the owner of vehicle
car Tata Tiago bearing registration
No.CG12AU1164, which was found in
commission of excise offence and has been
seized by the Police, Police Chowki CSEB,
Police Station Kotwali, District Korba
(C.G.) vide Crime No.852/2020.
2.
The petitioner made an application under
Section 457 of CrPC for grant of interim
custody of the vehicle in question before
the Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Korba, which has been rejected vide order
dated 24.11.2020 in Criminal Case
No.1073/2020, against which the criminal
revision was filed before the First
Additional Session Judge, Korba, which
has also been rejected vide order dated
12.01.2021
in
Criminal
Revision
No.01/2021.
3.
I have heard learned counsel for the
parties and perused the records.
4.
Admittedly, pursuant to the seizure of
the vehicle in question, the confiscation
proceedings for confiscation of the
vehicle in question have been initiated
by the Collector/District Magistrate,
Korba and the fact of initiation of
confiscation proceedings has already been
informed by the Collector to the Judicial
Magistrate. As such, jurisdiction of the
Criminal Court is barred by Section 47D
of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1961 to
grant interim custody of the vehicle.
However, the petitioner is at liberty to
make
an
application
before
the
Collector/District Magistrate, Korba for
interim custody of the vehicle in
question within 15 days from today, which
will be considered and decided in
accordance with the principles laid down
by the Supreme Court in the matter of
Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai vs State Of
Gujarat1 within next 15 days.
5.
With the aforesaid observation, the
petition under Section 482 of CrPC stands
disposed off.
Sd/
Sanjay K. Agrawal
Judge
Nirala
1
(2002) 10 SCC 283