HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
RAMAKANT PANDEY (PETITIONER IN PERSON) – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
CRMP 366/2021
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Reserved on 30.9.2022
Order Delivered on 21.10.2022
Cr.M.P. No. 363 of 2021
Anil Maurya, S/o Firturam Maurya, presently aged about 50
years, R/o Kapil Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, District Bilaspur
(C.G.) Mo. No. 9827972971
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the District Magistrate,
Through: the Police Station Chakarbhatha, District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
2. Uttam Pandey, S/o Bhagwat Prasad Pandey, aged about
65 years, R/o Behind Sai Mandir, Shiv Vihar, Tifra, Bilaspur,
Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. S.K. Kushwaha, Adv. appears on
behalf of Mr. Anil Mourya, appearing in
person
For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Dy. Adv. General
For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Uttam Pandey, appearing in person
Cr.M.P. No. 364 of 2021
Rajnish Singh Baghel, S/o Shri Samarjit Singh (in the order
impugned name is mentioned as Rajnish Singh, S/o Samarjit
Sigh, presently aged about 43 years, R/o Plot No. 22, Shanti
Nagar, Police Station – Civil Lines, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
Mob. No. 9424296550
---- Petitioner
2
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the District Magistrate,
Through: the Police Station Chakarbhatha, District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
2. Uttam Pandey, S/o Bhagwat Prasad Pandey, aged about
65 years, R/o Behind Sai Mandir, Shiv Vihar, Tifra, Bilaspur,
Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Rajnish Singh Baghel, appearing in
person
For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Dy. Adv. General
For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Uttam Pandey, appearing in person
Cr.M.P. No. 366 of 2021
Ramakant Pandey, S/o Gajadhar Prasad Pandey, aged about
48 years (presently), R/o Kapil Nagar, P.S. Sarkanda, District
Bilaspur (C.G.)
Mob. No. 9806139572
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through: the District Magistrate,
Through: the Police Station Chakarbhatha, District Bilaspur
(C.G.)
2. Uttam Pandey, S/o Bhagwat Prasad Pandey, aged about
65 years, R/o Behind Sai Mandir, Shiv Vihar, Tifra, Bilaspur,
Tahsil and District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Ramakant Pandey, appearing in
person
For Respondent No. 1 : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Dy. Adv. General
For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Uttam Pandey, appearing in person
3
Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K.Chandravanshi
Order [CAV]
1.
Since all the three petitions have arisen out of a common
order dated 11.02.2021 passed by Second Additional Sessions
Judge, Bilaspur in Criminal Revision No. 13/2020 and order dated
17.12.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bilha,
District Bilaspur (C.G.) in Criminal Case No. 166/2014, therefore,
they are being heard analogously and decided by this Common
Order.
2.
These petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, 1973 (for brevity “Cr.P.C.”) have been preferred against
the order dated 11.02.2021 passed by Second Upper Sessions
Judge, Bilaspur in Criminal Revision No. 13/2020, affirming the
order dated 17.12.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class,
Bilha in Criminal Case No. 166/2014, whereby, application filed by
respondent No. 2/complainant for summoning the Investigating
Officer alongwith Rojnamcha-Sanha No. 729, dated 17.09.2012 for
getting it exhibited during the course of his examination was
allowed.
3.
The imperative facts required to be noticed for adjudication of
these petitions are as under:
3.1. The petitioners-in-person are facing trial in connection with
Criminal case No. 166/14 (State of Chhattisgarh v. Rajnish Singh &
others) before the court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bilha,
4
Dist