HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
KHEMLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 1759/2021
['PALAK JINDAL', '', 'KAMAL KISHOR PATEL', 'Vinod Kumar Chandra', 'GAJEDNRA SINGH', 'ABHISHEK PATHAK', 'SURFARAJ KHAN', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1759 of 2021
1. Khemlal S/o Daduram Aged About 37 Years
2. Butairam S/o Bhagwani Aged About 52 Years
3. Shobharam S/o Mahettar Aged About 48 Years
All R/o Village Amoda Tahsil Jaijaipur District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue
Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Collector Of District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh
3. Sub-Divisional Officer Cum Land Aquisition Officer Sakti District Janjgir
Champa Chhattisgarh
4. Executive Engineer Public Work Department Champa Division, Champa
District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Shri Surfaraj Khan, Advocate
For Respondents/State
:
Ms. Sunita Jain, GA
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order
25/03/20
21
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are land
holder at village Amoda. Petitioner No.1 is the owner of the land bearing
Khasra No.818/1 admeasuring 0.12 acres, Petitioner No.2 is the owner of
the land bearing Khasra No.843, 844 admeasuring 0.28 acres and Petitioner
No.3 is the owner of the land bearing Khasra No.114/2 admeasuring 0.60
acres at village Amoda, Tahsil Jaijaipur, District Janjgir-Champa. He would
submit that the State Highway is being constructed and widening of road is
being done on the route Basantpur to Ghoghari. He would submit though
the land of the petitioners are being acquired by force, neither the
2
compensation is paid nor any proceeding for compensation is drawn.
Therefore, the respondent authorities may be directed to acquire the land in
accordance with law.
2. It has been contended that the land of the petitioners are being acquired for
widening / construction of the road in between Basantpur to Ghoghari, if the
land is acquired without any lawful acquisition it will offend to Article 300A of
the Constitution. In view of this, considering the limited prayer of the
petitioners, the respondent No.2, 3 & 4 are directed to demarcate the land of
the petitioners and if it is found that the said land falls within the ambit of the
affected area of construction of road then in such case the proceeding for
acquisition of the land be made in accordance with law and thereafter the
adequate compensation be paid to the affected person. The said process be
completed within the outer limit of six months.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off.Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
Judge
SdSD SD
gouri