HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
RAVI SHANKAR BHAGAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRC 2266/2021
['SANJEEV KUMAR SAHU', '', 'PRABHAKAR TIWARI', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
Proceedings through Video Conferencing
MCRC No. 2266 of 2021
•
Ravi Shankar Bhagat S/o Late Maniya Ram Bhagat Aged About
26 Years Caste- Uraon, R/o Kharsota, Chowki- Manora, Police
Station- Jashpur, Tahsil And District- Jashpur, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
•
State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police
Station- Jashpur, District- Jashpur (Wrongly Mentioned As
Police Station, Manora), Chhattisgarh
---- Non-applicant
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Applicant
: Shri Sanjeev Sahu, Adv.
For respondent/State
: Shri Anand Sharma, Dy. Govt. Adv.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice
N.K. Chandravanshi
Order On Board
31-5-2021
1.
This is first bail application filed under Section 439 of the
Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been
arrested on 15-1-2021 in connection with Crime No. 15/2021
registered at Police Station Jashpur Distt. Jashpur (C.G.), for the
offence punishable under Sections 376, 509 (B) of the Indian Penal
Code and Section 67, 67(A) of the Information Technology Act.
2.
Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, before marriage of
the prosecutrix, the prosecutrix had love affairs with the applicant.
After marriage the prosecutrix stopped talking to him. In the month
of July 2020 when husband of the prosecutrix had gone out for
work, applicant telephoned her and called her near school. When
she went near school on fear, the applicant forcibly undressed her
2
and made physical relation with her and made a video. He used to
threat her that he will make the video viral. On 1-12-2020 the
applicant sent the video through Whatsap to one Basant to make it
viral. Basant sent the same to husband of the prosecutrix through
Whatsap. Thereafter offence under Section 15/2021 under Section
376, 509(B) of the IPC and Sections 67 and 67(A) of the IT Act has
been registered against the applicant.
3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant
has been falsely implicated by the complainant due to previous
enmity. The prosecutrix is a 30 years old lady and she is a
consenting party. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since
15-1-2021, charge sheet has already been filed, he will not abscond
if bail is granted to him, therefore, present applicant may also be
enlarged on bail.
4.
On the contrary, learned State counsel opposes the
application for grant of bail.
5.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, nature
and gravity of offence, period of detention and also considering the
fact that the trial will take some more time for its conclusion, as per
submission of the counsel for the applicant that he will not abscond,
charge sheet has already been filed, without further commenting on
merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.
6.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be
released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in sum of Rs.
50,000/- with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction
3
of the concerned trial Court. He shall appear before the trial court
regularly on each and every date as per direction of the court,
unless exempted from appearance.
7.
In view of above order, I.A. No. 1/2021 for urgent hearing, I.A.
No. 2/2021 for listing the case during summer vacation stand
disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/-
(NK Chandravanshi)
VACATION JUDGE
Pathak/-