HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Branch Manager, Cholamandam M.s.general Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Manju Manjesh Rathore – Respondent
WP227 265/2017
['NILESH KUMAR THAKUR', '', 'ROHITASHVA SINGH', 'neelam singh yadav', 'BHASKAR PAYASHI', 'shokie Yadav', 'PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN']
1
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No.265 of 2017
Branch Manager, Cholamandam M.S. General Insurance Company,
Raipur, Address- 2nd Floor, Simran Tower, Opp. Bhartiya Jeevan Beema
Nigam, Pandri, Police Station-Pandri, Civil and Revenue Dist. Raipur
(CG) (INSURER)
----Petitioner
Versus
Smt. Manju Manjesh Rathore Wd/o Late Radheshyam Rathore, R/o
Near Vidhyoday School, Bodhghat Colony, Jagdalpur Thana-Dist.Bastar
(CG)
---- Respondent
WP227 No.123 of 2014
1. Cholamandlam MS G.I.Co. Ltd. Through Manager, Above Axix
Bank Nayapara, Jagdalpur PS Jagdalpur Civil and Revenue Dist.
Jagdalpur C.G.
2. Cholamandlam MS G.I.Co. Ltd. Through Manager, Branch office,
First Floor, Hinduja Complex, Near Chhoti Line, Devendra Nagar,
Raipur, At present-in-front of L.I.C. near Railway Line, PS Pandri,
Civil and Revenue Dist. Raipur C.G.
----Petitioners
Versus
M/s Ashoka Engineers & Contractor Aroraj Premniwas, Vrandawan
Colony, Jagdalpur Dist. Bastar, C.G. Through- Partner Shri Ashok Arora
S/o Late Vajir Chand aged 61 years, R/o Aroraj Premnivas, Vrandawan
Colony, PS Jagdalpur Civil & Revenue Dist. Jagdalpur Civil & Revenue
Dist. Jagdalpur Dist. Bastar, C.G.
---- Respondent
And
WP227 No.03 of 2013
2
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Company Limited, Through Branch
Office Millennium CTIT Park, Unit No. T-2-2A Tower Second, Plot No.
DN-62, Sector-5, Salt-Lake, Kolkata-700 091, At present Near Vanijjya
Bhawan, P.S. Devendra Nagar, Devendra Nagar Road, Raipur (CG)
----Petitioner
Versus
Ramkumar Soni W/o Rajkumar Soni aged about 22 years, R/o Rajkumar
tent House No.4, Main Road, Bacheli, P.S. Bacheli, Dist Dantewada
(CG)
---- Respondent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioners
: Mr.Bhaskar Payashi, Advocate
For Respondents/Claimants : Mr.Paveen Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
24/01/2019
1. Taking exception to the order passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat
(PLA) (Public Utility Services) (PUS), Bastar at Jagdalpur
constituted under Section 22B of the Legal Services Authorities
Act, 1987 (hereinafter called as “the Act of 1987”) by which the
said PLA (PUS) has passed the award directing payment of
compensation, this batch of writ petitions under Article 227 of the
Constitution of India have been filed by the petitioners herein.
2. Since common question of fact and law is involved in these writ
petitions, they were heard analogously and are being decided by
this common order.
(For the sake of convenience, the facts mentioned in
WP227 No.265 of 2017 are being taken up as lead case:-)
3
2.1 The claimant/respondent herein filed an application under
Section 22A of the Act of 1987 before the PLA (PUS) stating
inter-alia that husband of the respondent namely Radheshyam
Rathore has got a Group Personal Accident Insurance Policy
issued from the petitioner/Insurance Company for the period
commencing from 1.2.2011 to 31.1.2012, he died during which
the insurance policy was in force as he was murdered on
2.10.2012 and offence under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the
IPC was registered against the accused persons. Claim was
made by the respondent/claimant to the petitioner-Insurance
Company, which was denied to her leading to filing of the
application. The PLA (PUS) on 22.8.2014 directed the other
side to file reply. Ultimately, reply was filed and case was
directed to be placed for compromise on 13.10.2014. On
18.11.2014 the PLA (PUS) directed that the matter be placed
before the National Lok Adalat and if no settlement is arrived at
between the parties, then the matter will be taken up for
hearing on 9.12.2014. The matter was not settled in the
National Lok Adalat and ultimately, the impugned award was
passed on 17.8.2016, which has been questioned