SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUDHIR THAKUR – Appellant
Versus
CHHATTISGARH HOUSINGH BOARD – Respondent


Advocates:
['GARY MUKHOPADHAYAY', 'Ravindra Sharma', '', 'A G', 'SANJAY PATEL']

1

WA No. 111 of 2021

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WA No. 111 of 2021

Sudhir Thakur S/o Shri Ashok Thakur, Aged About 36 Years

R/o. Dhanlaxmi Nagar, Bhanpuri, Tahsil And District Raipur

Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

(Not arrayed as Party/respondent in WPC No.1574/2021)

Versus

1. Chhattisgarh Housing Board Through Executive Engineer,

Division 1, Kabir Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Revenue

Department , Mahanadi Mantralaya , Naya Raipur , Atal

Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Competent Authority Under The Urban Land (Ceiling And

Regulation) Act 1976, Collectorate , Raipur , District Raipur

Chhattisgarh.

4. Collector, Collectorate, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. Ghanshyam Sahu, S/o Phul Singh Sahu, Aged About 62

Years R/o 21, Verr Savarkar Nagar, Sondongari, Raipur,

District Raipur Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Appellant

:- Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Advocate

For Respondent No.1:- Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate

For Respondent-State:- Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy.A.G.

For Respondent No.5:- Mr. Ravindra Sharma, Advocate

Proceedings through Video Conferencing

Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top