SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
MUKESH KUMAR DAKKHANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 1438/2022



1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

W.P.(C) No. 1438 of 2022

Mukesh Kumar Dakkhani S/o Late Shri Jeevat Ram Dakkhani Aged About 45

Years R/o Tilda Camp P.S. Tilda District Raipur, Civil And Revenue District

Raipur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Senior Superintendent Of Police Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Khamtarai Raipur

Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

: Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocate

For State-respondents

: Mr. Vikash A. Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

Order On Board

22/03/2022

Heard.

1.

It is submitted that the petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved

by the inaction of the Collector, Raipur.

2.

It is submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing

registration No.C.G.-04-LF-0767, which has been seized in connection

with Crime No. 160 of 2021 for the offence under Section 34 (2) of

C.G. Excise Act. The petitioner has moved an application on

17.07.2021 praying for interim custody of the vehicle under seizure but

the same is pending without any decision so far. Therefore, the

confiscating authority may be directed to decide the application for

grant of interim custody of the vehicle at the earliest.

2

3.

Learned state counsel opposes the petition and the submission made

in this respect.

4.

Considered on the submissions. As the prayer of the petitioner for

grant of vehicle in interim custody is already pending, before the

confiscating authority, Collector, Raipur, therefore, this petition is

disposed off. The Collector, Raipur is directed to consider on the

application for supurdnama filed by the petitioner and decide the same

at the earliest within a time limit of 30 days.

5.

With these observation, this petition stands disposed off.

Sd/-

(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant)

Judge

balram

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top