HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
MUKESH KUMAR DAKKHANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 1438/2022
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(C) No. 1438 of 2022
Mukesh Kumar Dakkhani S/o Late Shri Jeevat Ram Dakkhani Aged About 45
Years R/o Tilda Camp P.S. Tilda District Raipur, Civil And Revenue District
Raipur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2.
Senior Superintendent Of Police Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Khamtarai Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
: Mr. Ajay Mishra, Advocate
For State-respondents
: Mr. Vikash A. Shrivastava, P.L.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
22/03/2022
Heard.
1.
It is submitted that the petitioner is before this Court being aggrieved
by the inaction of the Collector, Raipur.
2.
It is submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the vehicle bearing
registration No.C.G.-04-LF-0767, which has been seized in connection
with Crime No. 160 of 2021 for the offence under Section 34 (2) of
C.G. Excise Act. The petitioner has moved an application on
17.07.2021 praying for interim custody of the vehicle under seizure but
the same is pending without any decision so far. Therefore, the
confiscating authority may be directed to decide the application for
grant of interim custody of the vehicle at the earliest.
2
3.
Learned state counsel opposes the petition and the submission made
in this respect.
4.
Considered on the submissions. As the prayer of the petitioner for
grant of vehicle in interim custody is already pending, before the
confiscating authority, Collector, Raipur, therefore, this petition is
disposed off. The Collector, Raipur is directed to consider on the
application for supurdnama filed by the petitioner and decide the same
at the earliest within a time limit of 30 days.
5.
With these observation, this petition stands disposed off.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant)
Judge
balram