SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRAKASH KASHYAP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH and ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['MALAY KUMAR BHADURI', 'PRAVIN KUMAR TULSYAN', 'KUNDAN SINGH', 'A G', 'PRAFULL N BHARAT', '', 'SANTOSH BHARAT']

1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR AFR

CRR No. 544 of 2005

Prakash Kashyap

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

--Respondents

For applicant - Shri M.K. Bhaduri, Advocate.

For State- Shri S.R.J. Jaiswal, PL.

For Respondents No.2 to 5- Shri Santosh Bharat, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

Order

29/08/2017

1.

Challenge in this revision is to the order dated 3/12/2005 passed by

the Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.) Kabirdham (Kawardha) in Criminal

Appeal No.12/2005 wherein quantum of sentence was interfered by the

appellate court. Present revision is by the complainant.

2.

Perusal of the order of the JMFC dated 27/08/2005 would show that

Sukhlal (A-1) accused was convicted under Section 148 IPC and was

sentenced to 6 months RI and further under Section 326 IPC sentenced to

3 years RI and fine of Rs.5000/- and under section 25 of the Arms Act he

was sentenced to 1 year SI and fine of Rs.500/- was imposed whereas in

respect of Ajit (A-2), Vijay (A-3) and Tularam (A-5) they were convicted

under section 147 IPC and were sente

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top