HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
RAM KHILAWAN KURREY – Appellant
Versus
COMPETENT AUTHORITY CUM LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER – Respondent
WPC 2009/2021
['Ankit Pandey', '', 'Apoorv Mishra', 'ANIL PANDEY', 'A G', '', 'ABHISHEK SINHA', 'R S PATEL']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2009 of 2021
Ram Khilawan Kurrey S/o Late Jeth Ram Kurrey Aged About
61 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Shanti Nagar, Tifra, District-
Bilaspur,Chhattisgarh.
--- Petitioner
Versus
1. Competent Authority Cum Land Acquisition Officer The Sub
Divisional Officer(Revenue), Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur,
Chhattisgarh.
2. South East Central Railway Through General Manager , New
Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. Pin-495004.
3. Deputy Chief Engineer (Survey And Construction) South East
Central Railway New Zonal Building, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
Pin- 495004.
---- Respondents
For the Petitioners
: Mr. Ankit Pandey, Advocate
For the State/R-2 & R-3
: Mr. R. S. Patel, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
16
.06.2021
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land of
the petitioner has been acquired and despite that, adequate
compensation has not been paid and he has been
dispossessed. It is further submitted that the land was
acquired by the Railways and the award has been passed.
2. Counsel for the respondents would submit that if the
petitioner is not satisfied with the quantum of compensation,
he may approach the Arbitrator under section 20F of The
Railways Act, 1989. He submits that the arbitrator has been
appointed on 14.07.2020.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also do not dispute the
2
fact that the arbitrator has been appointed and he may be
given liberty to approach the Arbitrator.
4. As per section 20 subsection (6) of the Railways Act, 1989,
the petitioner may approach the Arbitrator by filing a suitable
application and as stated by counsel for the parties, the
Commissioner, Bilaspur Division is already appointed as
arbitrator.
5. In view of such submission of the parties and since the award
has been passed, the petitioner may avail the remedy u/s
20F sub-section (6) of The Railways Act, 1989 within a
further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of this
order to refer the matter to the Arbitrator.
6. With such observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI
JUDGE
R a o