HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SHANTI SHRIWAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 1667/2022
['RAJNI SOREN', '', 'Kanta Nandi', 'PRITAM SINGH', 'Jitendra Kumar Sonwani', 'CHANDNI', 'AMARNATH PANDEY', 'KISHORE NARAYAN', 'A G']
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 1667 of 2022
• Shanti Shriwas W/o Prabhakar Shriwas, aged About 28 Years R/o Village
Rahangi, Chakarbhata, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department of Health and
Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Collector Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
3. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
4. Medical Superintendent Chhattisgarh Institute of Medical Sciences (Cims),
Bilaspur , District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
---Respondents
For Petitioner
: Ms. Rajni Soren, Mr. Jitendra Kumar Sonwani and Ms.
Chandani, Advocate
For State
: Mr. Rahul Jha, G.A.
S.B.-Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order on Board
07.04.2022
Heard on petition.
1.
It is submits that the petitioner had undergone the operation of tubectomy on
13.10.2018 regarding which she was issued a certificate i.e. Annexure-P/1.
Subsequent to that, the petitioner has again conceived, which shows that the
tubectomy procedure has failed. The pregnancy was confirmed by the USG dated
18.04.2021, vide Annexure-P/2 and that the petitioner had to go for termination of
pregnancy regarding which the document is Annexure-P/3.
2.
The petitioner has filed her representation before the Respondents No. 03 and
2
04 praying for compensation as per the Family Planning Indemnity Scheme, but the
same is pending without consideration.
3.
The State counsel representing all the Respondents opposes the submissions
and submits that the petitioner has gone through the investigation and termination of
pregnancy procedures, in the private hospitals which will be required tobe verified.
4.
After considering on the submissions the petition is disposed of. The petitioner
is granted liberty to file a fresh representation within time limit of 15 days and on filing
of such representation, Respondents No. 3 and 4 will verify the claims of the
petitioner and subsequent to that take decision on her representation in accordance
with the Family Planning Indemnity Scheme of the Government of India, within a time
limit of 45 days.
5.
With the aforesaid observation(s)/direction(s), this petition stands disposed of.
6.
Certified copy as per rules.
-Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant)
Judge
vaishali