CAV Order

Per Parth Prateem Sahu, J

1. Rejection of technical bid of petitioner company by respondent No.2 considering that petitioner company does not fulfil the 'work experience' criteria as prescribed under Clauses 6 & 7.2 of the Notice Inviting Tender (NIT), made the petitioner company to approach this Court by way of filing this writ petition, seeking following relief:-

“10.1. That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to set aside the Technical Bid Evaluation Summary dated 28.3.2022 issued by Respondent No.4 (Annexure- P/4) whereby the petitioner has been declared to be disqualified in Technical Bid for not fulfilling the Work Experience criteria.

10.2. That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to quash the tender proceedings from the stage of considering the price bids.

10.3. That, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to reprocess the tender from the stage of price bid considering the petitioner to be a qualified bidder in Technical evaluation having proper work experience.

10.4. Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit be granted.”

2. Facts relevant for disposal of this writ petition are that respondent SECL issued NIT bearing No.SECL/ BSP/CMC/ RGH/e-Tender/491