Advocates:
['Surya Kawalkar Dangi', '', 'Saurabh Dangi', 'Aditi Singhvi', 'A G', '', 'Virendra Verma INTER', 'Ashutosh Trivedi']

Page 1 of 17

AFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Reserved on : 24/05/2021

Delivered on : 28 /05 2021

WP (C) No. 2200 of 2021

•

Sundara Multispecialty Hospital CDCRI Dental College

Campus, Village- Sundara, N.H.- 06, Rajnandagaon, District

Rajnandagaon, Chhattisgarh, Through Shri Nemichand Parekh,

Chairman, S/o Late S. K. Parekh, A/o 60 Years, R/o G E Road,

Sundara Village, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Secretary, Medical and Family

Welfare Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya

Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)

2.

Directorate of Health Services, 3^rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal

Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur (C.G.)

3.

Chief Medical and Health Officer (CMHO) District- Rajnandgaon,

(C.G.)

4.

Collector, District- Rajnandgaon, Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

---- Respondents

For Petitioner

:

Mr. Saurabh Dangi, Advocate.

For State/ respondents :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Narendra Kumar Vyas

C.A.V.

ORDER

1.

The petitioner, who is running Sundara Multispecialty Hospital

(hereinafter referred to as 'the Hospital'), has filed present writ

petition challenging the order dated 04.05.2021 (Annexure P/1)

passed by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Rajnandgaon

whereby the registration granted to the hospital for violation of

Page 2 of 17

Chhattisgarh State Upcharyagriha Tatha Rogopchar Sambandhi

Anugyapan Adhiniyam 2010 (For short, “the Act, 2010”) which is

also commonly known as “Nursing Home Act 2010”, has been

suspended for one month and it has been restrained to admit

new Covid Patients for treatment for one month from the date of

order.

2.

The facts projected by the petitioner, in brief, are that the

petitioner is running a super specialty hospital at Rajnandgaon .

On 19.09.2020, the hospital was granted permission for

providing treatment to 100 COVID patients out of which 60

beds are reserved for COVID patients and 40 beds are

reserved for suspected COVID patients. The Chief Medical

Officer and Health officer vide its memo dated 05/04/2021 has

made dedicated COVID hospital to Petitioner Hospital. It was

further directed by respondent No.3 that out of 60 reserve

beds 41 beds should have been oxygenated and 2 ventilators

should be made available in the Hospital .

3.

The hospital was inspected by the Committee on 27.4.2021 and

following short-comings were pointed out by the committee :-

“1-bl dk;kZy; ds i= dzekad@ 2033] jktukanxako fnukad

5@4@2021 ds ek/;e ls vkidks dqy 60 dksfoM csM lapkfyr djus

dh vuqefr iznku dh x;h Fkh fdUrq vkids }kjk 100 csM ds dksfoM

vLirky dk lapkyu fd;k tk jgk gSA blds lkFk gh vLirky

izca/ku }kjk 60 csM dksfoM ejht ,oa 40 csM vU; ejhtksa ds fy, gS dh

tkudkjh nh x;h] fdUrq fnukad 28@4@2021 dks ,MfeV lHkh ejhtksa

dk bZykt dksfoM ls lacaf/kr okMZ esa fd;k tkuk ik;k x;k gSA

2- fujh{k.k ds nkSjku dsl 'khV ,oa vafre fcfyax 'khV dk eqvk;uk

fd;k x;k ftlesa iSFkkykWth VsLV] fgesVksykWth VsLV] ,Dl js] ;q-,l-

th-] ,oa fljksykWth] buosLVhxs'ku dk fcy ejht dks pktZ fd;k x;k

gSA blds vfrfjDr gkWbZ Mªx ¼jsefMflfoj batsD'ku bR;kfn½ ds vfrfjDr

vU; nokbZ;ksa dk pktZ Hkh ejht ls fy;k x;k gSA blds lkFk gh 'kklu

}kjk dksfoM ejhtksa ds bZykt gsrq nj fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fdUrq

vkidh laLFkk }kjk mDr vkns'k ds vOgsyuk djrs gq, dksfoM ejhtksa ls

vfrfjDr pktZ fy;k x;k gSA

Page 3 of 17

3- fujh{k.k ds nkSjku vkids laLFkk varxZr jsefMflfoj batsD'ku dk

Ø;&foØ; nLrkostksa dk la/kkj.k fu;ekuqlkj ugh ik;k x;k rFkk

vkS"kf/k;kas dk LVkWd fujad ik;k x;kA

4- Ø; nLrkost fjdkMZ ds vuqlkj batsD'ku Ø; esa cSp uEcj esa

vfu;feRrk ik;h x;h gSA

vr% bl laca/k esa vki viuk tokc 24 ?kaVs esa v/kksgLrk{kjdrkZ vf/kdkjh

dks vfuok;Z :i ls izLrqr djuk lqfuf'pr djsaA”

4.

The petitioner has submitted its reply mainly contending that on

19.09.2020 petitioner has been granted permission for 100

bedded hospital for COVID out of which 60 beds for