SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Dinesh Chandra Gupta – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPC 2205/2015



Advocates:
['RAVI MAHOBIA', '', 'A K PRASAD', 'RISHIKANT MAHOBIA', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 2205 of 2015

1. Dinesh Chandra Gupta S/o Late Ram Avtar Gupta, Aged About

60 Years Member Baikunthpur Shiksha Bal Kalyan Samiti

Baikunthpur, R/o Bajar Para Baikunthpur, District Koria, Civil And

Revenue District Koriya Chhattsigarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Cooperative

Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District

Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Registrar, Firms & Societies, Raipur, District Raipur

Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Registrar, Firms & Societies, Bilaspur Division,

Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent

For Petitioner

Shri A.K. Prasad, Advocate

For Respondent/State

Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy. Adv. General

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

Order On Board

09/12/2015

1. In this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the

petitioner has prayed for a direction to the respondent No.2

Registrar, Firms & Societies to decide the petitioner's application

under Section 32 of the Chhattisgarh Societies Registrikaran

Adhiniyam, 1973 (for short 'the Act, 1973').

2. It appears the petitioner has raised a dispute about

working/affairs of the Baikunthpur Shiksha Bal Kalyan Samiti by

moving an application on 27-12-2014 under Section 32 (2) of the

Act, 1973.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit the about one

year has elapsed after moving the application, but no proceeding

has been drawn by the competent authority, therefore, for the

present the petition may be disposed of with a direction to the

respondent No.2 to decide the dispute at the earliest.

4. In view of the limited relief, at this stage, the writ petition is

disposed of with a direction that on the application preferred by

the petitioner under Section 32 of the Act, 1973 the Registrar

shall issue notice to all the contesting parties and decide the

dispute, in accordance with law and on its own merits, at the

earliest, preferably within a period of six months from the date of

submission of certified copy of this order.

Sd/-

Judge

Prashant Kumar Mishra

Gowri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top