HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Ranichand Baiga – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
WPPIL 27/2017
['RAJNI SOREN', '', 'KISHORE NARAYAN', 'SAMISHTI SALOMAN', 'YOUGESHWAR SHARMA', 'Kanta Nadi', 'A G', '', 'ASSTT S G']
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPPIL No. 27 of 2017
1.
Ranichand Baiga W/o Sudhar Singh Baiga Aged About 30 Years R/o Village
Chaparva Block Lormi P. S. Lormi District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
2.
Krishna Bai Baiga W/o Vinod Baiga Aged About 30 Years R/o Village
Chaparva Block Lormi P. S. Lormi District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
3.
Sita Bai Baiga W/o Pardesi Baiga Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Chaparva
Block Lormi P. S. Lormi District Mungeli Chhattisgarh
4.
Krishna Kumar Baiga S/o Pilaram Baiga Aged About 30 Years R/o Village
Sarasdol Gram Panchayat Achankmar P. S. Lormi Block Lormi District Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
5.
Ramkunwar Baiga W/o Asaram Baiga Aged About 30 Years R/o Village
Mangalpur Gram Panchayat Karka Tehsil Kota P. S. Kota District Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh
6.
Anita Baiga W/o Milaoram Baiga Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Mangalpur
Gram Panchayat Karka Tehsil Kota P. S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
7.
Amrika Bai Baiga W/o Chaitram Baiga Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Nevsa
Tehsil Kota P. S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
8.
Samaruram Baiga S/o Late Net Ram Baiga Aged About 60 Years R/o Village
Nevsa Tehsil Kota P. S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
9.
Rekha Bai W/o Budhram Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Aurapani Gram
Panchayat Mazgaon P. O. Semaria P. S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
10.
Shivkumari W/o Milap Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Umaria Gram
Panchayat Umaria P. O. Belgahana P. S. Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh
11.
Harendra Singh Sijwali S/o Bahadur Singh Sijwali Aged About 32 Years R/o
Jan Swasthya Sahyog I-4 Parijat Colony Nehru Nagar, P. S. Civil Lines
Bilaspur 495001 Chhattisgarh
12.
Jan Swasthya Abhiyan Chhattisgarh Through Its Joint National Convener
Sulakshana Nandi W/o Samir Garg Age 42 C-503, Avenue 144 Amlidih P. S.
Rajendra Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary Mantralaya Naya Raipur
Chhattisgarh
2.
Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare Government Of
Chhattisgarh Mantralaya Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh
3.
Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Welfare Government Of Chhattisgarh
Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4.
Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Government Of India Nirman
Bhawan, New Delhi
wppil 27 of 2017
2
5.
Sub Divisional Officer Lormi S D M Office Block Lormi District Mungeli
Chhattisgarh
6.
Sub Divisional Officer, Kota S D M Office Block Kota District Bilaspur
Chhattisgarh
---- Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Petitioners
:
Ms Rajni Soren, Advocate
For Respondents/State
:
Shri AS Kachhawaha, Additional
Advocate General
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi
, Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu
Order on Board
Per
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
, Chief Justice
12.12.2018
1.
The present Public Interest Litigation has been brought about by the
petitioners who are supposed to belong to primitive tribal groups and are
officially labelled as Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTG). They
have a grievance that based on an archaic Office Order dated 13.12.1979
issued by the erstwhile state of Madhya Pradesh, specially the department
of Public Health and Family Welfare, the tribes or sub-tribes whose names
have been indicated and who inhabit the geographical areas indicated
therein are barred from availing the facility of undergoing family planning
procedure by Tubectomy or vasectomy etc.
2.
According to the petitioners, such an embargo by an administrative
order in the name of protection of the group violates their constitutional right
under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
wppil 27 of 2017
3
3.
While the matter was under cons