SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

PRINCIPAL BENCH CHHATTISGARH
SUBASH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDRA TRACTORS AGENCY AND ANR. – Respondent


Order on Board

15.2.2018

1. With the consent of Learned Counsel appearing for the parties, the revision is heard finally.

2. This revision has been preferred by the Applicant/accused against the order dated 21.7.2010 passed by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (FTC), Raigarh in Criminal Revision No.151 of 2009 by which the Learned Additional Sessions Judge has allowed the revision preferred against the order dated 3.10.2009 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raigarh in Criminal Case No.111 of 2007 partly allowing the application under Section 91 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in favour of the Applicant/accused and directing the Respondents herein to submit a copy of the computerised sheet in the Court.

3. The Complainants/Respondents admittedly run a business of selling tractor-trolley and other articles. As per the complaint averment, the Applicant/accused purchased a tractor-trolley and other articles from the Complainants whose payment of Rs.5,50,400/- was due to be paid by him to the Complainants. He paid a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- against the due amount of purchase and for remaining sum of Rs.1,50,400/- he issued a cheque in favour of the Complainants amounting to Rs.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top