1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

MCRC No. 3766 of 2022

1. Krishna Son of Pyarelal Pardhi, Aged About 40 Years R/o Village

Ragara, Police Station Chhuikhadan, Tahsil Khairagarh, District

Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

2. Ashok S/o Rupram Pardhi, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village

Kukurmuda, Police Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon

(C.G.)

---- Petitioner

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O昀케cer, Police

Station Chhuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon (C.G.)

---- Respondent

MCRC No. 3767 of 2022

1. Krishna S/o Pyarelal Pardhi Aged About 40 Years R/o Village

Ragara, Police Station Chhuikhadan, Tahsil Khairagarh, District-

Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

2. Ashok S/o Rupram Pardhi Aged About 35 Years R/o Village

Kukurmuda, Police Station Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon,

Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O昀케cer, Police

Station Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

MCRC No. 3770 of 2022

1. Krishna S/o Pyarelal Pardhi Aged About 40 Years R/o Village

Ragara, Police Station Chhuikhadan, Tahsil Khairagarh, District-

Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

2. Ashok S/o Rupram Pardhi Aged About 35 Years R/o Village

Kukurmuda, Police Station Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon,

Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

2

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House O昀케cer, Police

Station Chhuikhadan, District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent

For Applicants

Mr. Rudranath Mukherjee, Advocate

For Respondent /State

Mr. BL Sahu and Mr. Sudhir Sahu,

Panel Lawyers

SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Kumar Tiwari

Order On Board

11/5/2022

1. Heard.

2. These are the applications 昀椀led under Sectin 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicants,

who have been arrested in connection with Crime Nos.34/2022,

32/2022 & 33/2022 registered at Police Station Chhuikhadan,

District Rajnandgaon (CG) for the o昀昀ence punsihable under

Sections 379 of the IPC and 41-A (4) of Cr.P.C. respectively.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the applicants along with the

co-accused have committed theft of bu昀昀aloes belonging to the

complainant.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants

are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the case. The

applicants are in jail since 27.1.2022, therefore, he prays for

releasing the applicants on regular bail.

3

5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the

bail applications. He submits that there are four criminal

antecedents of the applicants.

6. Having heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties

and also considering the pre-trial detention of the applicants

and that the conclusion of trial may take some more time, I am

of the opinion that present is a 昀椀t case to release the applicants

on regular bail.

7. Accordingly, the applications are allowed and the applicants are

directed to be released on bail on each of them furnishing a

personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with two sureties each

in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Along

with the bail bonds, copies of the Aadhar Card and coloured

Post Card full size photo shall also be submitted by the

applicant as well as by the sureties, which shall be duly veri昀椀ed

by the trial Court. They are directed to appear before the trial

Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

8. Certi昀椀ed copy as per rules.

Sd/-

( Deepak Kumar Tiwari)

Judge

Shyna