SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
DAKESHWAR SONI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPPIL 74/2021



Advocates:
['Sachin Nidhi', '', 'AJAY KUMAR CHANDRA', 'MUKUL CHATURVEDI', 'A G']

1

WPPIL No. 74 of 2021

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPPIL No. 74 of 2021

1. Dakeshwar Soni S/o Bhushan Lal Soni Aged About 44 Years

R/o Shubhash Ward, Kanker, P.S. And Tehsil - Kanker, Distt,

Uttar Bastar-Kanker (Chhattisgarh)

2. Ashok Valecha S/o- Pratab Valecha Aged About 34 Years

R/o - H.No. 09, Shitla Mandir No. 02, Kanker, Uttar Bastar,

Kanker, Chhattisgarh- 494334.

3. Rameshwar Singh Kashyap S/o- Rashik Raj Aged About 57

Years R/o. Radha Krishna Mandir, Manjhapara, Kanker,

Uttar Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh- 494334.

4. Geeta Sharma W/o Paras Lal Sharma Aged About 55 Years

R/o- 15/136, Rajapara Ward, Kanker, Uttar Bastar Kanker,

Chhattisgarh- 494334.

5. Deepak Panjwani S/o- Dayal Panjwani Aged About 23 Years

R/o House No. 36, Aamapara Ward Kanker, Uttar Bastar,

Kanker, Chhattisgarh- 494334.

6. Biplab Sarkar S/o Biresh Aged About 22 Years R/o 54- Ward

No. 12, P.V. 55, Pump No. 07, Pakhanjur, Kanker

Chhatisgarh- 494776.

7. Gurudas Biswas S/o Sanjay Biswas Aged About 31 Years

R/o- 07 Ward No. 13, Baikunthpur P.V. 125, Pakhanjur, Uttar

Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh - 494776

8. Sagar Lakhwani S/o- Vijay Lakhwani Aged About 24 Years

R/o- H.No. 66, Amapara, Kanker, Uttar Bastar, Kanker,

Chhattisgarh- 494334.

9. Haresh Chakradhari S/o- Kanhaiya Ram Chakradhari Aged

About 34 Years R/o 12, Shitla Para Chichgaon Ward No. 01,

Gram Panchayat Chichgaon, Post- Kulhaadkatta, Kanker,

Chhattisgarh- 494669

10. Brojen S/o Gourang Aged About 26 Years L.L.B. Student

2

WPPIL No. 74 of 2021

R/o- Radha Krishna Mandir, Manjhapara, Kanker, Uttar

Bastar Kanker, Chhattisgarh - 494334

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, The Urban

Administration And Development Department, 4th Floor, D-

Block Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, Distt.- Raipur

(Chhattisgarh)

2. The Commissioner Bastar Sambhag, Jagdalpur, Distt.-

Bastar.

3. The Collector District - Uttar Bastar, Kanker (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Tahsildar Kanker District Uttar Bastar Kanker

(Chhattisgarh)

5. The Naib Tahsildar (Nazool) Kanker, Tehsil Office, District-

Uttar Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh)

6. The Nazul Officer, Kanker District- Uttar Bastar Kanker

(Chhattisgarh)

7. The Municipal Council Through Chief Municipal Officer,

District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh)

8. The Chief Municipal Officer The Municipal Council- Kanker,

Tahsil - Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (Chhattisgarh)

---- Respondents

For Petitioners

:-

Mr. Sachin Nidhi, Advocate

For Respondent-State :-

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy.AG

Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ

Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, J.

Order On Board

By

3

WPPIL No. 74 of 2021

Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag.CJ

01/07/2021

1. Heard.

2. Petitioners have preferred this PIL seeking the following

reliefs :-

“10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to

call for the relevant records from the respondents

pertaining to the case of the petitioner for its kind

perusal.

10.2 That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold and

declare that encroachment/illegal construction upon

3000 Square Meter government land from ad-

measuring area 9642 square meter having sheet

no.13 A, plot no.99/1, by the Municipal Council,

Kanker in Government land as well as land reserved

for the purposes of parking of public vehicle is illegal

as per the directions issued by the Hon'ble Apex

Court.

10.3 To issue an appropriate writ or orders or directions

against the respondents authorities and to conduct

strict enquiry for closing the revenue proceeding

and also to conduct the strict actions against them

for contemptuous act and for violating the strict

directions issued by the Hon'ble Apex Court.

10.4 Any other relief deemed fit in the facts and

circumstances of the case may also be granted.”

3. The area in question is within territorial limits of the

Municipal Council, Kanker. The said local body has applied

4

WPPIL No. 74 of 20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top