HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SANJAY AMBASTHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
WPC 2653/2021
['SHAKTI RAJ SINHA', '', 'Nishi Kant Sinha', 'A G']
-1-
AFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
W.P.(C) No. 2653 of 2021
Sanjay Ambastha, S/o. Mohan Gopal Ambastha, Aged About 51 Years,
R/o. Suman Sadan, Darripara, Ambikapur, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare
Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
2. The Nodal Officer, Ram Krishna Care Hospital, Regional Transport Office,
Raipur Chhattisgarh.
3. The District Collector, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
4. D.H.O. cum Inquiry Officer, Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer,
District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
5. Ram Krishna Care Medical Science Pvt. Ltd., Through The Management,
Aurobindo Enclave Pachpedhi Naka, Dhamtari Road, District Raipur
Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner
:
Mr. Shakti Raj Sinha, Advocate
For State
:
Mr. Alok Bakshi, Addl. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
ORDER
02.07.2021
Heard
1.
The facts as pleaded, the petitioner's mother, aged about 69 years, was
admitted to hospital named Ram Krishna Care Medical Science Pvt. Ltd.
on 22.09.2020 with an infection of Jaundice and no symptom of Covid-19.
Subsequently, she was put in a Covid ward after she was tested covid
positive at the time of admission. It is stated that the mother was
administered with Remdesivir Injection and due to wrong treatment of
administrating injection her health got deteriorated from 26.09.2020.
Subsequently after deterioration Remdesivir injection was stopped.
Further, on 29.09.2020 RTPCR test was conducted wherein she was
found covid negative but still she was kept with the covid patient and on
-2-
02.10.2020 the mother of the petitioner died due to post covid
complication. Further, it is stated that the dead body was delivered to the
petitioner without following the safety protocol and it was transported
through the Ambulance without safety measures. Consequently, violation
of guidelines issued by the Central and the State Government was
committed by the respondent No.5, hospital, for which they are liable to be
prosecuted. With such pleading the two fold prayer is made. The hospital
is responsible for the negligent treatment and another one that the hospital
did not follow the covid protocol norms in handling the dead body;
therefore, the hospital is liable to be prosecuted.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the mother of the
petitioner when admitted was tested Covid-19 positive and though she
recovered from covid but eventually died on 02.10.2020. Before the date
of death, the RTPCR test was carried out of patient for covid and it was
found that she was negative; thereby recovered from covid but died
subsequently. It is stated though the mother of the petitioner died because
of covid complication yet after her death the dead body was handed over
without following the guidelines issued by the Government of India,
Ministry of Health & Family Welfare (Annexure P-6). He would submit that
as per the guidelines, the Hospital was required to give the body in a
double layer leak proof zipped body bag and to be handed over to the
transport employee. Whereas, in respect of case of mother of petitioner, it
was handed over to the petitioner instead and the petitioner carried the
body to Ambikapur and cremated the body there only. Consequently, the
guidelines which was issued under the Pandemic Act were not followed.
The counsel further submits that the applications complaining the
incidents were made to the respective Director, Health Services wherein
allegations were made but it was not taken care of. Therefore, this petition
to proceeding against the hospitals for penal actions.
-3-
3.
Learned State counsel opposes the argument advanced by the counsel for
the petitioner.
4.
Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the pleadings and the
documents appended thereto.
5.
The primary