SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
Akti Singh – Appellant
Versus
South Eastern Coalfields Limited – Respondent
WPC 476/2017



Advocates:
['PUSHPENDRA KUMAR PATEL', '', 'S GUPTA', 'N K KASHYAP', 'M BHARDWAJ', 'S DEWANGAN', 'D KUSHWAHA', 'U PANDEY', 'VINOD DESHMUKH', '', 'A G']

-1-

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 476 of 2017

1. Akti Singh S/o Babulal, Aged About 59 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar Batari,

Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

2. Ran Singh S/o Dev Singh, Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

3. Lallu Singh, S/o Khamhan Singh, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Nehru

Nagar, Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba

(Chhattisgarh)

4. Ballu Singh, S/o Khamhan Singh, Aged About 47 Years R/o Village Nehru

Nagar, Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba

(Chhattisgarh)

5. Ramkumar, S/o Hem Singh, Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

6. Hirendra Singh, S/o Lallu Singh, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

7. Umend Singh, S/o Mohar Singh, Aged About 54 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

8. Ramayan Singh, S/o Pratap Singh, Aged About 53 Years R/o Village Nehru

Nagar, Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba

(Chhattisgarh)

9. Kitab Singh, S/o Pratap Singh, Aged About 52 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

10.Jawan Singh, S/o Pratap Singh, Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

11. Gopal Singh, S/o Prem Singh, Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

12.Jay Singh Kanwar, S/o Sanjay Singh Kanwar, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village

Nehru Nagar, Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba

(Chhattisgarh)

13.Vijay Kumar, S/o Akti Singh, Aged About 33 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

14.Kishan Kumar, S/o Akti Singh, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Nehru Nagar,

Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

15.Akshay Kumar Kanwar, S/o Akti Singh, Aged About 26 Years R/o Village Nehru

Nagar, Batari, Police Station Dipka, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba

-2-

(Chhattisgarh)

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. South Eastern Coalfields Limited Through : Its Chief Managing Director, Head

Quarter Seepat Road, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)

2. South Eastern Coal Field Limited, Through : Its General Manager, Korba (West)

Kusmunda, Now Gevra Area, District Korba (Chhattisgarh)

3. The Collector, Korba, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer ( R), Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh

5. The Tahsildar, Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Petitioners

:

Shri Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate

For SECL

:

Shri Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate

For State

:

Shri Prasunn Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate

S.B.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava

Order On Board

01/03/2017

1. The grievance of the petitioners is that the petitioners or the father of the

petitioners were allotted small pieces of plots as a measure of rehabilitation in

view of acquisition of their land by the SECL. The plots were allotted to them in

addition to compensation paid towards acquisition of land. The petitioners have

rushed to this Court by filing this petition on an apprehension that the petitioners

may be dispossessed from their respective plots illegally, without the authority of

Law, without any notice.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent -SECL submits that the apprehension of the

petitioners is without any basis. Till date, no notices has been given to the

petitioners. He further submits that there may be cases where the plots holders

may have encroached upon a land beyond th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top