SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRAKASH CORPORATES – Appellant
Versus
DEE VEE PROJECTS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates:
['MANOJ PARANJPE', '', 'Anurag Singh', 'Prasoon Agrawal', 'Bharat Sharma', 'ANSHUL TIWARI', 'SHUBHANK TIWARI', 'VAISHALI MAHILONG', 'VIVEK MISHRA', 'Rishabh Garg', '', 'KSHITIJ SHARMA', 'Pragalbha Sharma', 'AMRITO DAS']

1

AFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

W.P.(227) No.

312 of 2021

Prakash Corporates T/16 Raheja Tower, Fafadih, Raipur, 492001

Chhattisgarh Through Its Partner Namely Shri Shailesh Kumar Goyal

S/o Shri Bhimsen Goyal, Aged About 37 Years, T/16 Raheja Tower,

Fafadih, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh (that the defendant was not

properly impleaded before the commercial court)

---- Petitioner

Versus

Dee Vee Projects Limited, Through Its Director, 1st Floor, Vikas

Complex, Power House Road, Korba 495678, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondent

For Petitioner

– Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate.

For respondent/caveator

– Mr. Amrito Das and Mr. Rishabh Garg,

Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant

Order on Board

09-07-2021

1. This petition under Article 227 of Constitution of India has been brought

being aggrieved by the order dated 22.06.2021 passed in Civil Suit

No.01-B/2021, by the Criminal Court District- Raipur, C.G., by which the

opportunity of the petitioner/defendants for filing written statement was

closed.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the

respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top