SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

Vikrant Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
['PALLAV MISHRA', '', 'SAMIR SINGH', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

WPC No. 1699 of 2015

1. Vikrant Singh S/o Ranvijay Singh, Aged About 24 Years R/o Deepak Nagar, Street

No. 6, Ward No. 23, Durg, Civil And Revenue District Durg. (Chhattisgarh)

2. Roma Singh, D/o. Ranvijay Singh, Aged About 26 Years R/o Deepak Nagar, Street

No. 6, Ward No. 23, Durg, Civil And Revenue District Durg. (Chhattisgarh)

3. Indu Singh, Wd/o Ranvijay Singh, Aged About 45 Years R/o Deepak Nagar, Street

No. 6, Ward No. 23, Durg, Civil And Revenue District Durg. (Chhattisgarh)

4. Rishu Singh, D/o. Ranvijay Singh, Aged About 27 Years R/o Deepak Nagar, Street

No. 6, Ward No. 23, Durg, Civil And Revenue District Durg. (Chhattisgarh)

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Local Self Government, Mandir

Hasoud, Naya Mantralaya, Raipur . (Chhattisgarh)

2. Municipal Corporation, Durg Through Commissioner, G. E. Road, Durg

(Chhattisgarh)

3. Joint Director, Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh, G.E.Road, Durg, Dist. Durg (Chhattisgarh)

---- Respondents

Shri Pallav Mishra, counsel for the petitioner/s.

Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Dy.G.A. for the State.

Shri Satish Gupta, counsel for Municipal Corpora

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top