HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SHAMAN AGNIHOTRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH – Respondent
MCRCA 872/2022
['Yatharth R Singh', '', 'CHANDRASHEKHAR BAJPAI', 'Achyut tiwari', 'Achal Choubey', 'ASHOK SAHU', 'A G']
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C(A) No.872 of 2022
Shaman Agnihotri S/o Shri Kushal Agnihotri Aged About 27 Years R/o Behind
Astha Hotel, Ward No. 18, Rani Avanti Bai Ward, Mandala, District Mandala
(M.P.)
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Sarkanda District Bilaspur (C.G.) .
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant:
ShrI Achyut Tiwari, Advocate.
For Non-Applicant/State :
Shri Raghavendra Verma, G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
Order on Board
25.08.2022
1.
This 1st anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure has been filed by the Applicant, who is apprehending his
arrest in connection with Crime No.573/2021 registered at Police Station –
Sarkanda, District – Bilaspur (CG) for the offence punishable under Section
509-B IPC.
2.
Prosecution case is that the complainant received an abusive message
from a fake Instagram ID of an unknown person, therefore, offence as mentioned
above has been registered against the present Applicant, who was found
involved in the said crime during investigation.
3.
Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is innocent
and has been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that
the Applicant was undergoing medical treatment for his mental ill-health, a
compromise has taken place between the complainant and the present Applicant,
he is a final year student of Chartered Accountancy having no criminal past,
therefore, he may be granted anticipatory bail.
4.
Per contra, learned Counsel for the State has opposed the said prayer.
5.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions
made, particularly considering the nature of allegations and that the complainant
and the Applicant have entered into a compromise, without further commenting
anything on merits, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the Applicant.
6.
Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event
of arrest of the Applicant, on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs 25,000/-
with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting Officer, he shall
be released on bail on the following conditions:-
(a) he shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement,
threat
or
promise
to
any
person
acquainted with the facts of the case so as to
dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the
Court.
(b) he shall not act in any manner which will be
prejudicial
to
fair
and
expeditious
trial,
and
(c) he shall appear before the trial Court on each
and every date given to him by the said Court till
disposal of the trial.
(d)
he shall not involve himself in any offence of
similar nature in future.
Sd/-
(Deepak Kumar Tiwari)
Judge
Priya