SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
SMT. SUMITA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
BHAVESH CHANDRA SARKAR – Respondent
CRR 536/2022



Advocates:
['Lavkush Kumar Sahu', '', 'HEMANT KUMAR SAHU', 'Pradeep Kumar Jogi', 'BHARAT LAL SONI', 'A G']

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

Criminal Revision No. 536 of 2022

Smt. Sumita Sarkar W/o. Shri Bhavesh Chandra Sarkar, aged about

39 years, daughter of Shri K.C. Mazumdar, resident of Kumharpara

Fafadih, P.S. Mopudahapara, Raipur (CG)

---- Applicant

Versus

1. Bhavesh Chandra Sarkar S/o. S.C. Sarkar, Aged about 43 years,

2. S.C. Sarkar, S/o. Late Sharadchandra Sarkar, aged about 74 years,

3. Smt. Jharna Sarkar, W/o. S.C. Sarkar, aged about 69 years,

4. All are resident of MIG 1/347, Housing Board Colony, Devrikhurd,

Police Station Torwa, District Bilaspur (CG)

---- Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the Applicant

:

Mr. Hemant Kumar Sahu, Advocate

For the Respondents

:

Mr. G.I. Sharan, Govt. Advocate

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Order on Board

30.05.2022

1.

The applicant has filed the present criminal revision challenging the order

dated 22.04.2022 passed by the Fourth Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur

by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge has allowed the

application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

2.

This Court has already directed to decide the case within two months.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the matter is listed

tomorrow for final argument. He would submit that if the direction be

issued to the Court below to decide the revision expeditiously that will

meet the ends of justic.

4.

Considering the submission made by counsel for the applicant, further

considering the fact that it is case under the Domestice Violence Act

therefore, it is directed that the trial Court shall make endavour to decide

the matter finally within outer limit fixed by this Court to decide the case

within two months.

5.

With this observation, the instant revision is finally disposed off.

Sd/-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas)

Vacation Judge

Santosh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top